New PC hardware advice - SLUniverse Forums
sluniverse logo SLUNIVERSE


Go Back   SLUniverse Forums > Community Discussion > Technical Help

Technical Help Discuss technical support issues here.

Reply
Old 10-01-2008, 11:30 AM   #1 (permalink)
Fortuna vitrea est
 
Tyche Shepherd's Avatar
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them milk themselves
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007

My Mood:

New PC hardware advice

I'm just about to order a new desktop PC - It will be used for a variety of tasks and will be running dual booted Vista 64bit and Linux (again 64bit) . I mentioned this here where I asked for some advice about dual booting vs virtualisation Talk about Linux (and help Linux noobs!) .


Aside from Second Life and SLU the usage will be mainly data analysis and related programming - Think high disk and CPU usage - Graphic analysis is lower priority but I'd like to play some more graphically intensive games than SL (though it doesn't have to be customised for this).


My budget is fixed so I now have to decide between several options trading one off against the others.
What order would you put on these possible upgrades ?
  1. CPU: Intel® Core 2 Duo E8500 upgraded to Intel® Core 2 Quad E9600
  2. RAM : 4.0GB DDR2 800mhz upgraded to 4.0GB DDR2 1066mhz
  3. Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce 8500GT 512MB to NVIDIA GeForce 9600GT 512MB
__________________

Vanguard of the LolCatz Revolution
This Post was financed by The National LolCatz Archives

Clancy Sullivan :Yeah. YEAH! The sultry seamstress of mirth is definitely in charge now.
Certified 7.8 on the Official Non-Arbitrary Trout Algorithmic Slut scale
Tyche Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2008, 12:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 400

My Mood:

I am not an expert, but it looks like you have them in the most logical order for your work.

SL should run just fine on the 8500.
Tranquility is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 10-01-2008, 09:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Foul
 
Sobriquet Kryakutnoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,074
Business: I Go Chop Your Dollar

My Mood:

Awards: 1
Thread Title of the Week 

Send a message via AIM to Sobriquet Kryakutnoy
From what I understand and what ZATZAi has stated previously, except in the case of applications specifically coded with 4 cores in mind a quad-core processor won't give you that great of a performance boost over dual-core. Unless you are simultaneously running several applications. But so far as individual application performance goes, not a massive difference.

I personally would go in the order of B, C, A. Or B, A, C. Depending on how many applications you are planning on running at once.

How big/fast is your hard drive, as well? If you are crunching large amounts of data a speedy hard drive is always handy. When I worked in professional video our biggest enemy, moreso than processing horsepower or display resolution, was actually drive access times.
__________________


[20:25] Mocksoup Graves: I am just like that.. I am a judger
[20:26] Mocksoup Graves JUDGES YOU

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
I've always been fascinated by penises. If I had one I'd probably just sit around and play with it all day.
Sobriquet Kryakutnoy is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
1 User Agreed:
Old 10-02-2008, 05:09 AM   #4 (permalink)
Fortuna vitrea est
 
Tyche Shepherd's Avatar
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them milk themselves
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007

My Mood:

The multiple applications running at once can occur a lot - A large MySQL database update whilst running a big dataset through a set of statistical routines as I'm also trying to browse is quite common .

The drives are 2x 500Gb S-ATAII 3.0Gb/s 8Mb cache (average seek 6ms) but I'm having them configured in Raid 1 - They are about the fastest I can get for budget yet still have two for raid 1 - There is a 1TB option with a 16Mb cache for about the same price but I'd have to sacrifice the Raid 1 option (And data loss scares me ) . 500GB is easily sufficient - The datafiles I work with are more in the 10 to 100Mb size - not like Video.

I've since looked at the differences between Vista Ultmate and Vista Home Premium and - The additional features in Ultimate are not what I really require so I'm cutting back to Home premium (unlikely to need over 16Gb Ram) . Which means I can upgrade CPU, RAM & Graphics
Tyche Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2008, 05:31 AM   #5 (permalink)
The Son of Avatar
 
Walker Moore's Avatar
Hiding
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,105

My Mood:

Yeah, I went with a dual-core after reading ZAT's excellent advice. A quad-core is an easy future upgrade if required though. I think a dual-core CPU and a quiet SATA-II drive are essential for running Vista because with those you're not going to notice a performance hit when background tasks like indexing and system maintenance are taking place.

I also opted for Vista Home Premium x64 because I don't need the additional features of Ultimate. I got the OEM version, which is about £66. You just have to understand that support from Microsoft is practically non-existent and that it's tied to a single machine. If you ever have to replace the motherboard, you have to buy it again.

Do lots of research before buying a 1TB drive because some are showing higher than usual failure rates. I almost went with a Samsung F1 until reading the horror stories (and I'm not talking about amateur reviews here), and ended up going for a Western Digital 640GB SATA-II drive instead because reliability is more important than size.

ETA: I misread while speed reading. Apparently you're not buying a 1TB drive, but configuring a RAID array. Sorry.
__________________
twitter | last.fm | flickr
Walker Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 10-02-2008, 06:45 AM   #6 (permalink)
Beachcomber
 
Karl Herber's Avatar
Blue
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 368
Blog Entries: 1

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tranquility View Post
I am not an expert, but it looks like you have them in the most logical order for your work.

SL should run just fine on the 8500.
Yep I'm running SL fine on a 8400 (though FPS slows to a crawl if I set SL graphics to "Ultra" )
__________________
Horse Tales - and - Free For Men
Karl Herber is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 10-02-2008, 06:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
Fortuna vitrea est
 
Tyche Shepherd's Avatar
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them milk themselves
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007

My Mood:

I've just received the new version of one of the main Statistical Suites I use and it seems that this version uses multi-threading on both multiple processors and multi-core processors for many of its algorithms so it looks like the Quad is a good upgrade in my case
Tyche Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 07:26 AM   #8 (permalink)
Fortuna vitrea est
 
Tyche Shepherd's Avatar
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them milk themselves
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007

My Mood:

My new PC is being shipped today - 2 weeks after ordering - It was delayed because the base motherboard for my model has been discontinued so they are upgrading to a higher spec one . Finally I should be able to play SL again , my current laptop just grinds to a halt after awhile
Tyche Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2008, 07:30 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Ramonna Villota's Avatar
Helvetti
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Iceland - Kansas
Posts: 2,858
SL Join Date: 3/6/06

My Mood:

Send a message via Yahoo to Ramonna Villota
congrats


See you in SL
__________________
Ramonna
Şú ert meğ andlit sem ağeins móğir getur elskağ, Tík elskhugi kyssast minn munnur


http://www.flickr.com/photos/25968648@N08/
Ramonna Villota is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Reply

Tags
advice, hardware, tycharrific, tyche didn't do this

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
vB.Sponsors Copyright 2008 SLUniverse.com / Hurricane Interactive.
All rights reserved.

Second Life(TM) and Linden Lab(TM) are trademarks or registered trademarks of Linden Research, Inc.
No infringement is intended.