SLUNIVERSE |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Fortuna vitrea est ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them
milk themselves
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007
My Mood: | New PC hardware advice I'm just about to order a new desktop PC - It will be used for a variety of tasks and will be running dual booted Vista 64bit and Linux (again 64bit) . I mentioned this here where I asked for some advice about dual booting vs virtualisation Talk about Linux (and help Linux noobs!) . Aside from Second Life and SLU the usage will be mainly data analysis and related programming - Think high disk and CPU usage - Graphic analysis is lower priority but I'd like to play some more graphically intensive games than SL (though it doesn't have to be customised for this).My budget is fixed so I now have to decide between several options trading one off against the others. What order would you put on these possible upgrades ?
__________________ ![]() Vanguard of the LolCatz Revolution This Post was financed by The National LolCatz Archives Clancy Sullivan :Yeah. YEAH! The sultry seamstress of mirth is definitely in charge now. Certified 7.8 on the Official Non-Arbitrary Trout Algorithmic Slut scale |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Foul ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | From what I understand and what ZATZAi has stated previously, except in the case of applications specifically coded with 4 cores in mind a quad-core processor won't give you that great of a performance boost over dual-core. Unless you are simultaneously running several applications. But so far as individual application performance goes, not a massive difference. I personally would go in the order of B, C, A. Or B, A, C. Depending on how many applications you are planning on running at once. How big/fast is your hard drive, as well? If you are crunching large amounts of data a speedy hard drive is always handy. When I worked in professional video our biggest enemy, moreso than processing horsepower or display resolution, was actually drive access times. |
| | |
| 1 User Said Thanks: |
| 1 User Agreed: |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Fortuna vitrea est ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them
milk themselves
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007
My Mood: | The multiple applications running at once can occur a lot - A large MySQL database update whilst running a big dataset through a set of statistical routines as I'm also trying to browse is quite common . The drives are 2x 500Gb S-ATAII 3.0Gb/s 8Mb cache (average seek 6ms) but I'm having them configured in Raid 1 - They are about the fastest I can get for budget yet still have two for raid 1 - There is a 1TB option with a 16Mb cache for about the same price but I'd have to sacrifice the Raid 1 option (And data loss scares me ) . 500GB is easily sufficient - The datafiles I work with are more in the 10 to 100Mb size - not like Video.I've since looked at the differences between Vista Ultmate and Vista Home Premium and - The additional features in Ultimate are not what I really require so I'm cutting back to Home premium (unlikely to need over 16Gb Ram) . Which means I can upgrade CPU, RAM & Graphics ![]() |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| The Son of Avatar ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Hiding
| Yeah, I went with a dual-core after reading ZAT's excellent advice. A quad-core is an easy future upgrade if required though. I think a dual-core CPU and a quiet SATA-II drive are essential for running Vista because with those you're not going to notice a performance hit when background tasks like indexing and system maintenance are taking place. I also opted for Vista Home Premium x64 because I don't need the additional features of Ultimate. I got the OEM version, which is about £66. You just have to understand that support from Microsoft is practically non-existent and that it's tied to a single machine. If you ever have to replace the motherboard, you have to buy it again. Do lots of research before buying a 1TB drive because some are showing higher than usual failure rates. I almost went with a Samsung F1 until reading the horror stories (and I'm not talking about amateur reviews here), and ended up going for a Western Digital 640GB SATA-II drive instead because reliability is more important than size. ETA: I misread while speed reading. Apparently you're not buying a 1TB drive, but configuring a RAID array. Sorry. |
| | |
| 1 User Said Thanks: |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Beachcomber ![]() ![]()
Blue
| Quote:
) | |
| | |
| 1 User Said Thanks: |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Fortuna vitrea est ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them
milk themselves
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007
My Mood: | I've just received the new version of one of the main Statistical Suites I use and it seems that this version uses multi-threading on both multiple processors and multi-core processors for many of its algorithms so it looks like the Quad is a good upgrade in my case |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Fortuna vitrea est ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Goats ?.. fuck'em .. Let them
milk themselves
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 4,040
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007
My Mood: | My new PC is being shipped today - 2 weeks after ordering - It was delayed because the base motherboard for my model has been discontinued so they are upgrading to a higher spec one . Finally I should be able to play SL again , my current laptop just grinds to a halt after awhile ![]() |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Helvetti
| congrats See you in SL
__________________ Ramonna Şú ert meğ andlit sem ağeins móğir getur elskağ, Tík elskhugi kyssast minn munnur http://www.flickr.com/photos/25968648@N08/ |
| | |
| 1 User Agreed: |
![]() |
| Tags |
| advice, hardware, tycharrific, tyche didn't do this |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |