| SL Status Updates Updates from the SL blog - reply only. |
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #126 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SLU Supporter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Running 'round in Circle's
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Australia
Posts: 6,949
My Mood: SLShopper Ads: 1 SL Join Date: 12-Oct-2003
Business: Psyke's Defence Systems Blog Entries: 3 | Quote:
__________________ Last edited by Psyke Phaeton; 10-29-2008 at 02:32 AM. | |
| | |
| 2 Users Said Thanks : |
| | #127 (permalink) |
| Uppity Alt ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() SLU Supporter ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
I'm the woman your mother
warned you about.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,869
My Mood: SLShopper Ads: 19 SL Join Date: October 2006
Business: Brazen Women Shapes and Skins | So, when all is said and done, if you take the Linden official line at face value, they believe that residents would be willing to pay US$125/mo for a sim that can only be used for transitory, decorative purposes. The boatload of prims they provide is to be spent on trees, rocks and boulders so that the occasional resident can stroll through (but not linger too long) or sail through. And since they suspended the requirement that OSS needed to be physically adjacent to a specific estate island, they obviously think these little islands in the sea are just what, virtual sprinkles? The SL equivalent of an Easter Egg that someone trips across by accident? That is just so much bullshit. LL quite deliberately and obviously made these OSS as attractive as possible for light residential use, providing features that are wholly unnecessary for a purely decorative land parcel but ideal for a home. |
| | |
| 8 Users Agreed: |
| | #128 (permalink) |
| The Purple ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Kinda at work. Somewhat.
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Somewhere purple, Germany
Posts: 3,096
My Mood: | Yes. They think people will pay that for a sim they're not supposed to live in, not supposed to make a profit from, not supposed to hang in for a longer timespan, and that isn't supposed to have lots of dynamic content in the first place. It's kind of baffling in that light, isn't it? |
| | |
| 7 Users Agreed: |
| | #129 (permalink) | |
| Hell is other people ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
MYOB
| Quote:
I also dont know what the charge to join 4 open space sims together will be. And what if an estate owner has 3 openspace sims...would they be able to pay the extra to make it up to one full prim sim and have them converted? | |
| | |
| | #130 (permalink) |
| The Purple ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Kinda at work. Somewhat.
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Somewhere purple, Germany
Posts: 3,096
My Mood: | Actually, they changed the transfer rule (forgot which thread that was in) so it now costs $100 for transferring up to 4 openspace sims at once. |
| | |
| 1 User Said Thanks: |
| 1 User Agreed: |
| | #132 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Behold, the power of flopsy
ears.
| Quote:
At least this isn't as embarrassing as that time I predicted that sculptie shoes would never amount to anything. | ||
| | |
| 9 Users Laughed: |
| | #133 (permalink) | |
| Is a bastage! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
It puts the lotion on it's
skin!!
Join Date: May 2008 Location: Cali
Posts: 3,066
My Mood: SL Join Date: 10-21-2004 | Quote:
Baffling until we stop and realize LL could not give much care in someone doing those things. The only profit they are concerned with is their own. Somehow they fail to realize if X avatar is making money so will LL in tier, etc. Just like how LL constantly makes land rental companies lose money.. they don't care about that, they just want to see who will pay the big bucks and hang on. That is a gamble that is beyond baffling. | |
| | |
| 2 Users Agreed: |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |