Ned Easterwood

I have thought for a while about experimenting with more petite female shapes. (The women in my family are all short.)

When I started messing around with one today, I ended up doing a shorter version of something Beebo might do - an athletic woman, but short. (Thinking in particular of my middle daughter.) I came up with this shape.



When I put Bea's old shape back on, I decided I liked the more athletic one better. She's less busty then Bea, though, so I adjusted the breast size/buoyancy/cleavage numbers to match the ones I am currently using.



(Angle isn't as good here - sorry.)

Bea always had muscular legs - was I subconsciously thinking of my daughter the runner when I did her shape? I'm trying to get a more cohesive whole here.

I welcome all feedback, thoughts, etc.

__________________
Ned

Preach not to others what they should eat, but eat as becomes you, and be silent. -- Epictetus

Do unto others as they would have done unto them.

God grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change; courage to change the things I can; and wisdom to know the difference. - Reinhold Niebuhr

Raindrop Drinkwater

This shape shows strength, I like it.

One critic, though: I think the torso may be a bit short compared to the legs. Also this pose makes it hard to judge the length of the arms (you know, to check for the T-Rex syndrom ).

__________________

Ned Easterwood

Cross post for the results:

I put the pics over there since she's standing around in sheer lingerie - that makes 'em glamor shots.