| Politics, Religion & Society Topics pertaining to politics, religion, philosophy, and social issues. Not for the faint of heart. Also, do not post while drunk, suffering from food poisoning, or while on a low carb diet. You have been warned. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | ||
| Wanderer and Lurker ![]() ![]()
Here, there, and nowhere
| Disenfranchisement marches on Quote:
Quote:
__________________ ~ I mean, who am I? That's the real question, isn't it? Who am I? Who are you? What other questions are there? What other questions are there, really? If you want to understand the universe, embrace the universe, the door to the universe is you!~ | ||
| | |
| 3 Users Said Thanks : |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]()
Making Mesh
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 756
My Mood: | Quote:
And yet, they claim these voter suppression changes have zero to do with political games. Yea right. | |
| | |
| 3 Users Agreed: |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *SLU Supporter* ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,160
My Mood: SL Join Date: 03/17/2004 | I don't see how not allowing voting on the weekend is disenfranchising people. It has been election day not election week, election month, election weekend for how long? It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required. Why even vote at all. |
| | |
| 4 Users Groaned: |
| 3 Users Laughed: |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Lustful Cockmonster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *SLU Supporter* ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Unedited
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood: SL Join Date: October 2004 Blog Entries: 1 | In principle I don't have a problem with requiring ID, but the point is that these changes are being done last minute simply to make it inconvenient (if not impossible) to get ID in time. Given that some states don't even supply temporary ID, and there's a lead time of several weeks to receive it, the only point is to try and make it impossible to get yours in time for the election. If you want to change the laws to stamp out a non-existent problem (10 cases of voter fraud since 2000, in the entire country) fine; do it after the election. Ohio went so far as to change the voting hours to reduce the time in predominantly Democratic districts while extending them in Republican ones. Literally. It's simply about making a specific group of people have a difficult time voting so your guy can win. |
| | |
| 1 User Likes This: |
| | #5 (permalink) | ||
| Grumpy Fun-Hater ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Bleh
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,748
My Mood: SL Join Date: 5/6/2004 | Quote:
Quote:
Washington State allows voting by absentee ballot for anyone. Mail in your ballot anytime you want, from the day it arrives at your address all the way up until election day. It works fine. Giving people more options for when to cast their vote has zero functional downside. Unless you're a Republican, since more people voting makes it more likely you'll lose your election. That's why they are doing things like this. [edit]I may have been slightly hyperbolic with that first sentence there. It looks like North Dakota allows voting without registration, so I assume someone there must have said something about it back in 1951. I amend the statement to mean: "No one has ever attempted to remove the registration requirement for voting where it currently exists, in the 21st century."
__________________ Last edited by Lianne Marten; 08-21-2012 at 09:01 AM. | ||
| | |
| 8 Users Agreed: |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,792
| Quote:
Getting 130 million people to the polls on the same day can be problematic, hence early voting. | |
| | |
| 1 User Said Thanks: |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Neko-licious™ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *SLU Supporter* ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Crumpet Khaleesi
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| 3 Users Agreed: |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *SLU Supporter* ![]() ![]() ![]()
Not eating peas
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Shady Falls
Posts: 2,024
| Allowing weekend voting gives those low-income working people who are not able to leave work to vote (despite the laws saying they must be allowed) an opportunity to participate in the democratic process. It is a good idea in urban areas and to create a policy that boils down to "too bad, too poor and too black - they shouldn't be allowed to vote" just takes me back to the voter suppression that happened in the early twentieth century. For as long as I remember - this country has *always* focused on making it easier for as many citizens to vote as possible. Voting is a civic duty, not a privilege. Preventing any registered citizen from voting is a shameful and possibly criminal act. |
| | |
| 3 Users Said Thanks : |
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Hidalgo, true and pure.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,116
My Mood: | Quote:
... And hope that your vote is actually tallied honestly and isn't changed to whatever the people running the system want it to be.
__________________ Quote:
| ||
| | |
| 4 Users Agreed: |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| genderqueer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Hail Woz, the great and
powerful!
| Umm ... you DO know "no ID to vote" was the norm before all of these voter ID laws, right?
__________________ Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| genderqueer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Hail Woz, the great and
powerful!
| Quote:
Getting required documentation, getting to the office (may or may not be near you and may or may not have hours that fit your schedule), and so on. *sigh* FOX seems to be distributing kool-aid everywhere now. | |
| | |
| 1 User Hugged You: |
| 2 Users Agreed: |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Lustful Cockmonster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *SLU Supporter* ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Unedited
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood: SL Join Date: October 2004 Blog Entries: 1 | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Hidalgo, true and pure.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,116
My Mood: | So if it's soooo important that people have an ID in order to contain all the voting fraud going on (I'm not sold on this but let's run with it for the sake of argument) then surely the thing to do is to make sure everyone has a free ID, with an easy and free way to replace it if something happens to it. Right? IDs = less voter fraud, right guys? Guys? Oh, wait, you just want to demand IDs so people can't vote because getting IDs can be made ridiculously hard. Gotcha. You can go die in a fire now. eta: Quote:
| |
| | |
| 7 Users Agreed: |
| 1 User Likes This: |
| | #16 (permalink) | |||
| Wanderer and Lurker ![]() ![]()
Here, there, and nowhere
| Quote:
If that's not disenfranchisement, I don't know what is. Way back in the beginnings of this country, people could just leave their farms or close their shops for the day and go vote. Back then, even big cities weren't anywhere near the size we have today. And, try to get a day off (or an hour, half day, whatever) today if you're a low to mid-wage earner. Single day voting is no longer an option in today's world, unless, of course, you're trying to make it near impossible for whole groups of people to vote. Quote:
| |||
| | |
| 5 Users Agreed: |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Senior Curmudgeon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *SLU Supporter* ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
I'm the woman your mother
warned you about.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,617
My Mood: SL Join Date: October 2006
Business: Brazen Women Shapes and Skins Client: v3 + Starlight | Every year that I work the polls in my county, I'm increasingly grateful for the process I see in place. We have early voting at the couthouse that starts at least a week ahead of an election and covers weekends and evenings. Anyone who wants to vote is given every opportunity to do so. If you opt for showing up at your precinct on the formal election day, the only requirement for casting your vote is that you can match the signature on the register polls. Only if the signature doesn't appear to match are you asked for any ID, and in a worst case scenario you will be asked to cast a provisional ballot. (You are provided with a tracking number for that ballot so you can learn the decision of the election board and can even contest it.) In every way, the process is transparent. |
| | |
| 1 User Agreed: |
| 10 Users Like This: |
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: SE Michigan/Toledo Ohio
Posts: 2,202
My Mood: SL Join Date: May 26, 2008
Business: Shabby Tabby Client: All of the above | Quote:
Oh wait, it is pointless for those who want to suppress the poor, working poor and minorities. Got it. | |
| | |
| 5 Users Agreed: |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() *SLU Supporter* ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,160
My Mood: SL Join Date: 03/17/2004 | One person one vote, all this no ID bullshit, and letting people vote for weeks is just so people can vote more than once. |
| | |
| 7 Users Groaned: |
| 4 Users Laughed: |
| 7 Users Disagreed: |
| | #20 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Hidalgo, true and pure.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,116
My Mood: | Quote:
Because if it was truly about the IDs all of that is the logical continuation. Right? | |
| | |
| 3 Users Like This: |
| | #23 (permalink) | ||||
| Grumpy Fun-Hater ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Bleh
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,748
My Mood: SL Join Date: 5/6/2004 | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
| | |
| 3 Users Said Thanks : |
| 4 Users Agreed: |
![]() |
| Tags |
| dirty bastards, disenfranchisement, election fraud |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| |