Disenfranchisement marches on - SLUniverse Forums
Navigation » SLUniverse Forums > Off Topic Discussion > Politics, Religion & Society » Disenfranchisement marches on


Politics, Religion & Society Topics pertaining to politics, religion, philosophy, and social issues. Not for the faint of heart. Also, do not post while drunk, suffering from food poisoning, or while on a low carb diet. You have been warned.

 
Sponsor:
Lionheart Virtual Estate - Experience the Difference!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2012, 12:23 AM   #1 (permalink)
Wanderer and Lurker
 
Micaela Darkwatch's Avatar
Here, there, and nowhere
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In a desert
Posts: 311
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Original September 2006
Client: Firestorm and Phoenix
Send a message via Skype™ to Micaela Darkwatch
Disenfranchisement marches on

Quote:
Husted issued an ultimatum to Dennis Lieberman and Tom Ritchie Sr., members of the Montgomery County Eleciton Board, to withdraw their resolution to maintain weekend hours or face suspension.
Members Of Election Board Suspended For Supporting Weekend Voting

Quote:
“I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban — read African-American — voter-turnout machine,” said Doug Preisse, chairman of the county Republican Party and elections board member who voted against weekend hours, in an email to The Dispatch. “Let’s be fair and reasonable.”
Voting in Ohio | Fight over poll hours isn
__________________
~ I mean, who am I? That's the real question, isn't it? Who am I? Who are you? What other questions are there? What other questions are there, really? If you want to understand the universe, embrace the universe, the door to the universe is you!~
Micaela Darkwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
3 Users Said Thanks :
Old 08-21-2012, 12:55 AM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
AshaSekayi Ra's Avatar
Making Mesh
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 756
My Mood:
Quote:
“I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban — read African-American — voter-turnout machine,” said Doug Preisse, chairman of the county Republican Party and elections board member who voted against weekend hours, in an email to The Dispatch. “Let’s be fair and reasonable.”
From Columbus Dispatch

And yet, they claim these voter suppression changes have zero to do with political games. Yea right.
AshaSekayi Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 08:32 AM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,160
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
I don't see how not allowing voting on the weekend is disenfranchising people. It has been election day not election week, election month, election weekend for how long?

It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required. Why even vote at all.
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 08:36 AM   #4 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
In principle I don't have a problem with requiring ID, but the point is that these changes are being done last minute simply to make it inconvenient (if not impossible) to get ID in time. Given that some states don't even supply temporary ID, and there's a lead time of several weeks to receive it, the only point is to try and make it impossible to get yours in time for the election.

If you want to change the laws to stamp out a non-existent problem (10 cases of voter fraud since 2000, in the entire country) fine; do it after the election.

Ohio went so far as to change the voting hours to reduce the time in predominantly Democratic districts while extending them in Republican ones. Literally. It's simply about making a specific group of people have a difficult time voting so your guy can win.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teeny Leviathan View Post
Those Super Gays are as tough as a T-800 terminator and they are gay.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Likes This:
Old 08-21-2012, 08:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
Grumpy Fun-Hater
 
Lianne Marten's Avatar
Bleh
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,748
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 5/6/2004
Quote:
“I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban—read African-American—voter-turnout machine.”
I had to re-read that quote several times to make sure that he actually provided the own subtext to his statement and it wasn't an author insert. This new trend for GOP members to state outright the actual reasoning behind their policies is... pretty interesting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
I don't see how not allowing voting on the weekend is disenfranchising people. It has been election day not election week, election month, election weekend for how long?

It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required. Why even vote at all.
Literally no one has ever said people should be able to vote without registering, anywhere, ever.

Washington State allows voting by absentee ballot for anyone. Mail in your ballot anytime you want, from the day it arrives at your address all the way up until election day. It works fine.

Giving people more options for when to cast their vote has zero functional downside. Unless you're a Republican, since more people voting makes it more likely you'll lose your election. That's why they are doing things like this.


[edit]I may have been slightly hyperbolic with that first sentence there. It looks like North Dakota allows voting without registration, so I assume someone there must have said something about it back in 1951. I amend the statement to mean: "No one has ever attempted to remove the registration requirement for voting where it currently exists, in the 21st century."
__________________

Last edited by Lianne Marten; 08-21-2012 at 09:01 AM.
Lianne Marten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 08:59 AM   #6 (permalink)
Ginger Supremacist
 
Ramen Jedburgh's Avatar
Heya ^_^
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 1,848
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 3/9/2006
Its not like these people aren't just appointed to their posts behind the scenes anyway.
__________________
--
Ramen Jedburgh
Abusively Cute ^_^
Ramen Jedburgh is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 09:04 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
I don't see how not allowing voting on the weekend is disenfranchising people. It has been election day not election week, election month, election weekend for how long?

It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required. Why even vote at all.
When a state with a history of extremely long lines at polling places is allowing night and weekend voting in predominantly Republican districts, but not Democratic ones, they're obviously trying to disenfranchise Democrats.

Getting 130 million people to the polls on the same day can be problematic, hence early voting.
Eris is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 08-21-2012, 09:45 AM   #8 (permalink)
Neko-licious™

*SLU Supporter*
 
Ann Launay's Avatar
Crumpet Khaleesi
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,808
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 8/8/06
Blog Entries: 4

Awards: 2
Uber Rare Teal Furby Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required. Why even vote at all.
Actually, I won't be happy until I can vote from the privacy of my home, using my computer.
__________________
Ann Launay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 09:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Eunoli Rain's Avatar
Not eating peas
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Shady Falls
Posts: 2,024
Allowing weekend voting gives those low-income working people who are not able to leave work to vote (despite the laws saying they must be allowed) an opportunity to participate in the democratic process. It is a good idea in urban areas and to create a policy that boils down to "too bad, too poor and too black - they shouldn't be allowed to vote" just takes me back to the voter suppression that happened in the early twentieth century.

For as long as I remember - this country has *always* focused on making it easier for as many citizens to vote as possible. Voting is a civic duty, not a privilege. Preventing any registered citizen from voting is a shameful and possibly criminal act.
Eunoli Rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 10:00 AM   #10 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Seyla Warden's Avatar
Hidalgo, true and pure.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,116
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ann Launay View Post
Actually, I won't be happy until I can vote from the privacy of my home, using my computer.

... And hope that your vote is actually tallied honestly and isn't changed to whatever the people running the system want it to be.
__________________
Quote:
The Republican Party needs to end now. You've fucked everything up. All your representatives are assholes and your primitive ideas are holding our country back. You are all utterly and completely worthless and irredeemable, and you hate human beings, America, and the planet we all share.
Seyla Warden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 10:30 AM   #11 (permalink)
genderqueer
 
Kara Spengler's Avatar
Hail Woz, the great and powerful!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 7,444
SL Join Date: March, 2006
Client: Phoenix & Firestorm
Send a message via Skype™ to Kara Spengler
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required.
Umm ... you DO know "no ID to vote" was the norm before all of these voter ID laws, right?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imnotgoing Sideways View Post
The debug setting for Gender in SL (AvatarSex) is an unsigned 32bit integer value. Not a boolean. I'm still waiting to see what our other options will be. =^-^=
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristiano View Post
Ok, I have to ask, WTF is this thread even about and why is it hundreds of posts? I am out of vodka so I don't feel like reading it to find out.
Kara Spengler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 10:34 AM   #12 (permalink)
Neko-licious™

*SLU Supporter*
 
Ann Launay's Avatar
Crumpet Khaleesi
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,808
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 8/8/06
Blog Entries: 4

Awards: 2
Uber Rare Teal Furby Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seyla Warden View Post
... And hope that your vote is actually tallied honestly and isn't changed to whatever the people running the system want it to be.
Oh, that reminds me. The demise of the electoral college will also be necessary for my happiness. It's outlived its usefulness.
Ann Launay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 10:36 AM   #13 (permalink)
genderqueer
 
Kara Spengler's Avatar
Hail Woz, the great and powerful!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 7,444
SL Join Date: March, 2006
Client: Phoenix & Firestorm
Send a message via Skype™ to Kara Spengler
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
In principle I don't have a problem with requiring ID, but the point is that these changes are being done last minute simply to make it inconvenient (if not impossible) to get ID in time. Given that some states don't even supply temporary ID, and there's a lead time of several weeks to receive it, the only point is to try and make it impossible to get yours in time for the election.

If you want to change the laws to stamp out a non-existent problem (10 cases of voter fraud since 2000, in the entire country) fine; do it after the election.

Ohio went so far as to change the voting hours to reduce the time in predominantly Democratic districts while extending them in Republican ones. Literally. It's simply about making a specific group of people have a difficult time voting so your guy can win.
I just had to defend why voter ID laws were a source of disenfranchisement on the LAST place where I would have expected to have to do so. A transgender advocacy email list.

Getting required documentation, getting to the office (may or may not be near you and may or may not have hours that fit your schedule), and so on.

*sigh* FOX seems to be distributing kool-aid everywhere now.
Kara Spengler is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Hugged You:
Old 08-21-2012, 10:50 AM   #14 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kara Spengler View Post
I just had to defend why voter ID laws were a source of disenfranchisement on the LAST place where I would have expected to have to do so. A transgender advocacy email list.

Getting required documentation, getting to the office (may or may not be near you and may or may not have hours that fit your schedule), and so on.

*sigh* FOX seems to be distributing kool-aid everywhere now.
That's a good point. It's immensely difficult to get those documents coordinated with your gender identity even when you happen to live in a state with progressive handling of the subject.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 10:57 AM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Seyla Warden's Avatar
Hidalgo, true and pure.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,116
My Mood:
So if it's soooo important that people have an ID in order to contain all the voting fraud going on (I'm not sold on this but let's run with it for the sake of argument) then surely the thing to do is to make sure everyone has a free ID, with an easy and free way to replace it if something happens to it. Right? IDs = less voter fraud, right guys? Guys?

Oh, wait, you just want to demand IDs so people can't vote because getting IDs can be made ridiculously hard. Gotcha. You can go die in a fire now.

eta:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hogarth Hughes
The Republican Party needs to end now. You've fucked everything up. All your representatives are assholes and your primitive ideas are holding our country back. You are all utterly and completely worthless and irredeemable, and you hate human beings, America, and the planet we all share.
http://forums.somethingawful.com/sho...7964&forumid=1
Seyla Warden is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Likes This:
Old 08-21-2012, 11:16 AM   #16 (permalink)
Wanderer and Lurker
 
Micaela Darkwatch's Avatar
Here, there, and nowhere
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: In a desert
Posts: 311
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Original September 2006
Client: Firestorm and Phoenix
Send a message via Skype™ to Micaela Darkwatch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
I don't see how not allowing voting on the weekend is disenfranchising people. It has been election day not election week, election month, election weekend for how long?

It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required. Why even vote at all.
The ban on weekend and after hours early voting was allowed in predominantly Republican areas and denied in predominantly Democratic -read African-American- areas. In 2008, when it was allowed, 48% of the voters in Franklin county (predominantly African-American and Democrat) voted in extended hours.

If that's not disenfranchisement, I don't know what is. Way back in the beginnings of this country, people could just leave their farms or close their shops for the day and go vote. Back then, even big cities weren't anywhere near the size we have today. And, try to get a day off (or an hour, half day, whatever) today if you're a low to mid-wage earner. Single day voting is no longer an option in today's world, unless, of course, you're trying to make it near impossible for whole groups of people to vote.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lianne Marten View Post
I had to re-read that quote several times to make sure that he actually provided the own subtext to his statement and it wasn't an author insert. This new trend for GOP members to state outright the actual reasoning behind their policies is... pretty interesting.
Quote:
“I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban—read African-American—voter-turnout machine.”
I did too. I still find it hard to believe he actually allowed himself to be quoted (via email, no less) a statement like that.
Micaela Darkwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 12:00 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Curmudgeon

*SLU Supporter*
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,617
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2006
Client: v3 + Starlight
Every year that I work the polls in my county, I'm increasingly grateful for the process I see in place. We have early voting at the couthouse that starts at least a week ahead of an election and covers weekends and evenings. Anyone who wants to vote is given every opportunity to do so.

If you opt for showing up at your precinct on the formal election day, the only requirement for casting your vote is that you can match the signature on the register polls. Only if the signature doesn't appear to match are you asked for any ID, and in a worst case scenario you will be asked to cast a provisional ballot. (You are provided with a tracking number for that ballot so you can learn the decision of the election board and can even contest it.)

In every way, the process is transparent.
__________________
Noob: "okay.... im in a house with cages and people in gags and the door just locked and i cant get out :c"
Beebo Brink is online now   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 08-21-2012, 12:19 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Rosemaery Lorefield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SE Michigan/Toledo Ohio
Posts: 2,202
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May 26, 2008
Business: Shabby Tabby
Client: All of the above
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
It seems that some people will only be happy when we have 24/7 voting, no ID or registration required. Why even vote at all.
I'm sorry, but what part of making voting more accessible makes voting pointless?

Oh wait, it is pointless for those who want to suppress the poor, working poor and minorities. Got it.
Rosemaery Lorefield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 12:28 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,160
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosemaery Lorefield View Post
I'm sorry, but what part of making voting more accessible makes voting pointless?

Oh wait, it is pointless for those who want to suppress the poor, working poor and minorities. Got it.
One person one vote, all this no ID bullshit, and letting people vote for weeks is just so people can vote more than once.
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 12:33 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Seyla Warden's Avatar
Hidalgo, true and pure.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,116
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
One person one vote, all this no ID bullshit, and letting people vote for weeks is just so people can vote more than once.
So then you would be on-board for the government footing the bill for EVERY citizen to get a free ID, with provisions in place to replace it (again, freely) without requiring a bunch of documents that can also be lost and extremely hard to replace if you don't already have them?

Because if it was truly about the IDs all of that is the logical continuation. Right?
Seyla Warden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 12:53 PM   #21 (permalink)
Banned
"jon" he does it!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Offaly, Republic of Ireland
Posts: 16,827
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Client: Phoenix & imprudence
Rape is more common in America than voter fraud. These gobshites have their priorities list in a bottle up their arses.
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 08-21-2012, 12:56 PM   #22 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
One person one vote, all this no ID bullshit, and letting people vote for weeks is just so people can vote more than once.
Ten cases.

Since 2000.

Ten. In the entire country.

No one is gaming the system.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:01 PM   #23 (permalink)
Grumpy Fun-Hater
 
Lianne Marten's Avatar
Bleh
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,748
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 5/6/2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
One person one vote, all this no ID bullshit, and letting people vote for weeks is just so people can vote more than once.
Policy Brief on the Truth About “Voter Fraud” | Brennan Center for Justice

Quote:
Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare. Most citizens who take the time to vote offer their legitimate signatures and sworn oaths with the gravitas that this hard-won civic right deserves. Even for the few who view voting merely as a means to an end, however, voter fraud is a singularly foolish way to attempt to win an election. Each act of voter fraud risks five years in prison and a $10,000 fine - but yields at most one incremental vote. The single vote is simply not worth the price.

Because voter fraud is essentially irrational, it is not surprising that no credible evidence suggests a voter fraud epidemic. There is no documented wave or trend of individuals voting multiple times, voting as someone else, or voting despite knowing that they are ineligible. Indeed, evidence from the microscopically scrutinized 2004 gubernatorial election in Washington State actually reveals just the opposite: though voter fraud does happen, it happens approximately 0.0009% of the time. The similarly closely-analyzed 2004 election in Ohio revealed a voter fraud rate of 0.00004%. National Weather Service data shows that Americans are struck and killed by lightning about as often.
Quote:
Voter fraud is often conflated with other forms of election misconduct. It is extremely rare for individuals to vote multiple times, vote as someone else, or vote despite knowing that they are ineligible. These rare occurrences, however, are often conflated with other forms of election irregularities or misconduct, under the misleading and overbroad label of “voter fraud.u201D Some of these other irregularities result from honest mistakes by election officials or voters, such20as confusion as to whether a particular person is actually eligible to vote. Some irregularities result from technological glitches, whether sinister or benign: for example, voting machines may record inaccurate tallies. And some involve fraud or intentional misconduct perpetrated by actors other than individual voters: for example, flyers may spread misinformation about the proper locations or procedures for voting; thugs may be dispatched to intimidate voters at the polls; missing ballot boxes may mysteriously reappear. These more common forms of misconduct are simply not addressed by the supposed “anti-fraud” measures generally proposed.
Quote:
Voter fraud is most often invoked as a substantial problem in order to justify particular election policies. Chief among these is the proposal that individuals be required to show photo ID in order to vote - a policy that disenfranchises up to 10% of eligible citizens. But the only misconduct that photo ID addresses is the kind of voter fraud that happens as infrequently as death by lightning. Therefore, it suits those who prefer photo ID as a policy to lump as much misconduct in with “voter fraud” as possible, to create the impression that the problem is far more significant than it actually is. Moreover, to the extent photo ID is suggested as a solution to the perception that voter fraud occurs, it behooves those who prefer photo ID to reinforce the unsubstantiated perception that voter fraud exists.
TL; DR: Individual voter fraud is about as common as getting struck by lightning. The only voter fraud that occurs in any significant numbers is the kind done by outside actors attempting to lower voter turnout.
Lianne Marten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:02 PM   #24 (permalink)
Neko-licious™

*SLU Supporter*
 
Ann Launay's Avatar
Crumpet Khaleesi
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,808
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 8/8/06
Blog Entries: 4

Awards: 2
Uber Rare Teal Furby Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
Ten cases.

Since 2000.

Ten. In the entire country.

No one is gaming the system.
Hush, Joshy. Eboni is proselytizing.
Ann Launay is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:12 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Amity Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,028
The working poor tend to have jobs that do not offer generous leave time. Extra time to vote relieves them from having to choose between voting and keeping their jobs.
Amity Slade is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
dirty bastards, disenfranchisement, election fraud

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On