Log Cabin Repubs weigh in on Chick-Fil-A - SLUniverse Forums
Navigation » SLUniverse Forums > Off Topic Discussion > Politics, Religion & Society » Log Cabin Repubs weigh in on Chick-Fil-A


Politics, Religion & Society Topics pertaining to politics, religion, philosophy, and social issues. Not for the faint of heart. Also, do not post while drunk, suffering from food poisoning, or while on a low carb diet. You have been warned.

 
Sponsor:
Lionheart Virtual Estate - Experience the Difference!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-31-2012, 01:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
Particle Laboratory Elf
 
Jopsy Pendragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillcrest, San Diego, USA
Posts: 5,564
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Jan 15 2004
Business: Light Sorcery
Log Cabin Repubs weigh in on Chick-Fil-A

Quote:
... marriage is not a right society grants to spoiled children.

Log Cabin Republican Executive Director R. Clarke Cooper.
R. Clarke Cooper: Chick-fil-A: Empty Calorie Diversion From Equality
Yes, the quote is taken out of context, and I agree with the over-all point Clarke is attempting to make... But this one statement left me disgusted, and insulted. A clear reminder of exactly how 'Uncle Tom'-ish, the LCR continue to be.

Marriage IS a right society grants to spoiled children:

Spoiled Children who marry and then trivially invalidate their impulsive marriages hours/days later.

Spoiled Children who flagrantly disregard their 'in sickness and in health, til death do us part' vows, to dump a sick spouse and marry a hale and hearty mistress.

Spoiled Children who, for publicity reasons, enter sham marriages (sometimes multiple times) in order to prove to their homophobic fans that they're big macho hetero studs.

Spoiled Children who are more concerned about staging their "All About ME! I get to be a Princess for a Day!" mega-party/wedding, and less concerned about whom they're marrying.

Spoiled Children who think that the purpose of marriage is solve the question of "who will clean up after me and cook for me now that I don't live with my mommy anymore?"

Clearly the filthy rich and GOP think that acting like 'spoiled children' is the most effective way to get exactly what they want... and they're succeeding at it. Crybaby Boener leading the way.


So, LCR? How about you STFU and, instead, go tell your GOP masters to pick THEIR battles instead.
Jopsy Pendragon is offline   Reply With Quote
3 Users Said Thanks :
Old 07-31-2012, 01:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,170
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
Out of all the great comments/thoughts in that article, that is what you zero in on? LOL
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 07-31-2012, 01:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Mercenary of Illusion
 
Isablan Neva's Avatar
Disruptive
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California! We do disasters right!
Posts: 3,938
My Mood:
SL Join Date: November, 2004
Business: Skybox Nirvana, Tenth Muse Furniture
The article is pretty much spot on. I don't support bans on Chick-Fil-A but I do support people not eating there if they disagree with the opinions of the President. The whole point of transparency of political donations is so that people can support businesses or not support businesses as they choose based on political activism.

Chick-Fil-A has a right to be a bigoted asshole, they have a right to make TRANSPARENT and OPEN contributions and the people have a right not to patronize the establishment if they disagree with Chick-Fil-A. Nobody is forcing anybody into a Chick-Fil-A franchise.

Just don't eat there, ask your friends not to eat there. Make sure everyone in your social circle knows Chick-Fil-A's stance on the issue and let them make their own choices.

That's how transparency SHOULD work.
__________________
________________________________

SLU: I came for the community. I stayed for the derails.


Visit my Marketplace Store!
Isablan Neva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 01:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
"jon" he does it!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Offaly, Republic of Ireland
Posts: 16,827
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Client: Phoenix & imprudence
You're not a republican because you're gay, You're a republican because you're Rich. Their pocket books rank higher in their priorities than their sexuality, clearly.
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 01:59 PM   #5 (permalink)
genderqueer
 
Kara Spengler's Avatar
Hail Woz, the great and powerful!
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: DC
Posts: 7,449
SL Join Date: March, 2006
Client: Phoenix & Firestorm
Send a message via Skype™ to Kara Spengler
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jopsy Pendragon View Post
A clear reminder of exactly how 'Uncle Tom'-ish, the LCR continue to be.
I never could understand them in the first place. They make about as much sense as people relying on government assistance who think those programs should be cut.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imnotgoing Sideways View Post
The debug setting for Gender in SL (AvatarSex) is an unsigned 32bit integer value. Not a boolean. I'm still waiting to see what our other options will be. =^-^=
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristiano View Post
Ok, I have to ask, WTF is this thread even about and why is it hundreds of posts? I am out of vodka so I don't feel like reading it to find out.
Kara Spengler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 02:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Particle Laboratory Elf
 
Jopsy Pendragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillcrest, San Diego, USA
Posts: 5,564
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Jan 15 2004
Business: Light Sorcery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
Out of all the great comments/thoughts in that article, that is what you zero in on? LOL
Damned right I did.

If Dan Cathy of Chick-Fil-A came out and said "We proudly support anti-ni**er groups with millions of dollars in donations."

Would you meekly say "oh, well, that's okay... I'll just shop elsewhere."

If someone told you that by exercising your 1st amendment rights to protest against that shop owner, that YOU were wrong and jeopardizing your civil rights movement?

LCR is trying to stop a tide with their precious little sand castle 'measured response' attitude. It's just useless posturing for advantage within their own party. It has nothing to do with helping move respect for marriage equality forward.
Jopsy Pendragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 02:06 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
"jon" he does it!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Offaly, Republic of Ireland
Posts: 16,827
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Client: Phoenix & imprudence
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jopsy Pendragon View Post

If someone told you that by exercising your 1st amendment rights to protest against that shop owner, that YOU were wrong and jeopardizing your civil rights movement?
They did say this about blacks back in the civil rights era.
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 02:09 PM   #8 (permalink)
Lizard of Speed and Time

*SLU Supporter*
 
Sredni Eel's Avatar
All Goffick and Stuff.
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nobuddy cumz in here. Sekrit.
Posts: 6,402
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Sept. 2007
Business: Avatar Bizarre
Client: Crash-o-Matic 2.0
Blog Entries: 25
Everyone has it wrong. You shouldn't eat at Chic-fil-A because the "food" there is atrocious.
Sredni Eel is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 07-31-2012, 02:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
"jon" he does it!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Offaly, Republic of Ireland
Posts: 16,827
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Client: Phoenix & imprudence
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sredni Eel View Post
Everyone has it wrong. You shouldn't eat at Chic-fil-A because the "food" there is atrocious.
Who doesn't like salt?
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 02:13 PM   #10 (permalink)
Particle Laboratory Elf
 
Jopsy Pendragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillcrest, San Diego, USA
Posts: 5,564
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Jan 15 2004
Business: Light Sorcery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Waves View Post
They did say this about blacks back in the civil rights era.
Oh certainly, and there definitely are times for a 'measured response', *after* the playing field has been leveled somewhat.

We're not there yet, and the conservatives are still treating marriage equality as if its some trivial fad that'll fade away if they stall long enough.
Jopsy Pendragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 02:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
Particle Laboratory Elf
 
Jopsy Pendragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillcrest, San Diego, USA
Posts: 5,564
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Jan 15 2004
Business: Light Sorcery
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sredni Eel View Post
Everyone has it wrong. You shouldn't eat at Chic-fil-A because the "food" there is atrocious.
I wouldn't know. Never gave them a chance. The only location I was aware of used to be in the middle of my very gay neighborhood... and they went out of business years and years ago. (huh, I wonder why)
Jopsy Pendragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:03 PM   #12 (permalink)
Lizard of Speed and Time

*SLU Supporter*
 
Sredni Eel's Avatar
All Goffick and Stuff.
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Nobuddy cumz in here. Sekrit.
Posts: 6,402
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Sept. 2007
Business: Avatar Bizarre
Client: Crash-o-Matic 2.0
Blog Entries: 25
I tried them years and years ago when I was working nearby and only had 30 minutes for lunch. The only place worse than Chic-fil-A is Popeye's. The less said about that place, the better.

Both make KFC seem like fine gourmet dining.
Sredni Eel is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Disagreed:
Old 07-31-2012, 03:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Amity Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,039
I don't see what is so radical or extreme about boycotting a restaurant. When it comes to social protest, boycotting a business is about one of the most civil and unpleasant means of social protest available. It's far less confrontational than a sit-in.
Amity Slade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:20 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
"jon" he does it!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Offaly, Republic of Ireland
Posts: 16,827
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Client: Phoenix & imprudence
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amity Slade View Post
I don't see what is so radical or extreme about boycotting a restaurant. When it comes to social protest, boycotting a business is about one of the most civil and unpleasant means of social protest available. It's far less confrontational than a sit-in.
Ironically, a huge plank of the right wing free marketeers ideology is the power of public opinion to boycott companies out of existence.

I guess it's only when it's companies they don't like.
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 03:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Amity Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,039
Change "gay activists" to "radical feminists," and change "boycotting Chick-Fil-A" to "burning bras," and I'm pretty sure I've heard Clarke's argument decades ago.
Amity Slade is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Likes This:
Old 07-31-2012, 03:33 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,170
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jopsy Pendragon View Post
Damned right I did.

If Dan Cathy of Chick-Fil-A came out and said "We proudly support anti-ni**er groups with millions of dollars in donations."

Would you meekly say "oh, well, that's okay... I'll just shop elsewhere."

If someone told you that by exercising your 1st amendment rights to protest against that shop owner, that YOU were wrong and jeopardizing your civil rights movement?

LCR is trying to stop a tide with their precious little sand castle 'measured response' attitude. It's just useless posturing for advantage within their own party. It has nothing to do with helping move respect for marriage equality forward.
Basically most corporations support anti-nigger groups. I am under no illusions about the lay of the land. And few threads ago I defended the right of the KKK to adopt a highway, on the basis of free speech.

Quote:
Instead of standing for an outdated and dying discrimination, Chick-fil-A would become a martyr for religious freedom.
I'm not sure if the fact they are Log Cabin Republicans is completely clouding your reading comprehension, but he didn't say anything against marriage. He said be careful with this ChikFila bullshit, because it can back fire on the agenda. Which I think it totally can and probably will, people are just creating a martyr where there doesn't need to be one. The is giving all those bible thumpers (ChikFilA is in the bible belt right?) a rallying point, and a brand to protect.

That aside, as I have stated before I feel that the gay equal rights movement is killing themselves on pushing marriage. They should be pushing general full on equality. Why would I support marriage, any marriage agenda gay or straight? Marriage is the most conservative and archaic of social constructs. I am for the rights of all people to be equal, like more equality to access of rights and benefits for people that are not in romantic relationships. So marriage, meh. I don't care. Equal rights, I would be willing to lay my life down for everyone to be treated equally.Equal rights for gays includes the right to marry and the right protect their partners but it is about a lot more than just marriage, equality at work, school, etc.

Quote:
LGBT Americans should take a lesson from Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.: "We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline."
This Chik-Fil-A movement of some bullshit, for a small chain that isn't even nationwide. There isn't a restaurant within a hundred miles of where I live. I feel it is unconstitutional to deny businesses permits based on their political or religious views, and I hope the ACLU takes up the case of Chik-Fil-A being denied permits in Boston. It starts with the clear cut cases that "everyone" can agree on, then it always gets murkier. If everyone can't be treated equally and equal access, then everyone loses.
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
1 User Likes This:
Old 07-31-2012, 04:14 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Kokoro Fasching's Avatar
Watering a Shoe
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where I lay down my head
Posts: 1,064
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
This Chik-Fil-A movement of some bullshit, for a small chain that isn't even nationwide. There isn't a restaurant within a hundred miles of where I live. I feel it is unconstitutional to deny businesses permits based on their political or religious views, and I hope the ACLU takes up the case of Chik-Fil-A being denied permits in Boston. It starts with the clear cut cases that "everyone" can agree on, then it always gets murkier. If everyone can't be treated equally and equal access, then everyone loses.
Chick-fil-A Restaurant Directory | Chicken Sandwich Restaurants

Looks like they are in 39 of 50 states... yep.. pretty small chain...

Quote:
SALES SUCCESS
  • Chick-fil-A Founder and Chairman S. Truett Cathy, who began his restaurant career more than 60 years ago with a single eatery, saw his company reach $4.1 billion in 2011 for an 13.08 percent increase over the previous year; same-store sales increased seven percent over 2010.
  • Since the first Chick-fil-Aź restaurant opened in 1967, the company has posted 44 consecutive annual sales increases.
  • Chick-fil-A remains the second-largest quick-service chicken restaurant chain in the country and one of the nation's largest privately held restaurant chains.
Tiny place indeed.
Kokoro Fasching is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Hugged You:
Old 07-31-2012, 04:20 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,170
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
Yeah it is a small chain, I can throw a rock and hit 4 McDonalds. They don't have a lot of free standing stores, they are in malls, and colleges. There isn't one free standing one in this entire state. They are small time.

Nice to know corporate propaganda still works though.
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 04:20 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Amity Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,039
I know this, Chick-Fil-A employs about half of my cousins' teenage children. And I have a whole lot of cousins.
Amity Slade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 04:22 PM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
"jon" he does it!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Offaly, Republic of Ireland
Posts: 16,827
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Client: Phoenix & imprudence
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
Yeah it is a small chain, I can throw a rock and hit 4 McDonalds. They don't have a lot of free standing stores, they are in malls, and colleges. There isn't one free standing one in this entire state. They are small time.

Nice to know corporate propaganda still works though.
Hilarious. Probably your inner republican wanting to call a chain in most US states "small"..
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 04:26 PM   #21 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tracer Graves's Avatar
passing out the lube
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,380
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
Out of all the great comments/thoughts in that article, that is what you zero in on? LOL
Actually, I think the article on the whole wasn't very good, and that line right there is a bunch of stupid bullshit, well worth highlighting.

Yeah... <sarcasm>Those spoiled little faggots stamping their feet cause they can't legally marry the person they love. What a bunch of petulant whiners!</sarcasm>

WTF?!
__________________
Tracer Graves is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 07-31-2012, 04:28 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,170
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
They are small, compared to other fast food restaurants. They are in limited locations, most malls won't even accept them because they are not open on Sundays.

I have no idea what math has to do with my inner republican. Richie you can troll me better than this, I expect more from you.

Locations in states doesn't matter as much as marketshare. I would imagine since they are small stores in rented locations they have a high profit ratio, but they aren't even in top 10 of anything.

2012 Top Ten Franchises | Entrepreneur.com
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 04:34 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tracer Graves's Avatar
passing out the lube
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,380
My Mood:
And to be perfectly honest, making a massive public spectacle of a business that is publicly anti human rights is PRECISELY what we need to do.
Tracer Graves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2012, 04:34 PM   #24 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Amity Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
They are small, compared to other fast food restaurants. They are in limited locations, most malls won't even accept them because they are not open on Sundays.

I have no idea what math has to do with my inner republican. Richie you can troll me better than this, I expect more from you.

Locations in states doesn't matter as much as marketshare. I would imagine since they are small stores in rented locations they have a high profit ratio, but they aren't even in top 10 of anything.

2012 Top Ten Franchises | Entrepreneur.com
So what is the size threshold of a company before it becomes a legitimate target of a boycott?
Amity Slade is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 07-31-2012, 04:36 PM   #25 (permalink)
Senior Member

*SLU Supporter*
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,170
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
I have zero issues with a boycott. Governments denying permits is another topic.
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On