Dan Savage Offends Christian Students - SLUniverse Forums
Navigation » SLUniverse Forums > Off Topic Discussion > Politics, Religion & Society » Dan Savage Offends Christian Students


Politics, Religion & Society Topics pertaining to politics, religion, philosophy, and social issues. Not for the faint of heart. Also, do not post while drunk, suffering from food poisoning, or while on a low carb diet. You have been warned.

 
Sponsor:
Lionheart Virtual Estate - Experience the Difference!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2012, 09:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Dan Savage Offends Christian Students

Dan Savage Speech Controversy: 'It Gets Better' Creator Offends Christian Students

Quote:
Dan Savage offended some Christian teens when he told them "We can learn to ignore the bull---t in the Bible about gay people."

Savage made his comments during a speech at the National High School Journalist Conference in Seattle.

After many students walked out of the speech, one of whom appeared to be crying, Savage said, “It’s funny, as someone who’s on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the bible, how pansy-assed some people react when you push back.”

Fox News reports that Savage's comments upset the executive director of GOProud, a gay conservative group.

"Dan Savage should apologize for his comments and should apologize to the high school students in attendance whom he called ‘pansy-asses,’” Jimmy LaSalvia told Fox. “It is ironic that someone whose claim to fame is fighting bullying would resort to bullying tactics in attacking high school students who were offended by his outrageous remarks.”
Personally, I wish he had said that to adult journalists. I'm not so sure they were as appropriate to high school students, even if they are supposed to aspire to journalism careers.

As it happens, the news media (and anti-gay groups) are zeroing in on how he offended some kids rather than the message he was delivering. So, once again, the media is creating its own controversy over and beyond what Savage himself created.

Video: Christian students walk out as Dan Savage attacks the Bible - PinkNews.co.uk

Quote:
Mr Savage, best known for the viral ‘It Gets Better’ campaign, was addressing a group of students at the National High School Journalist Conference in Seattle.

In the lecture, he said: “People often say that they can’t help with the anti-gay bullying acts because it says right there in Leviticus, it says right there in Timothy, it says right there in Timothy, it says right there in Romans, that being gay is wrong.”

“We can learn to ignore the bulls**t in the Bible and what it says about gay people,” he said, and went on to compare the acceptance of homophobic teachings to the acceptance of those verses which seem to support slavery and eating shellfish.

Although the audience seemed to applaud Mr Savage’s comments, some Christian students seemed to take offence and walked out.
Quote:
Mr Savage himself apologised if anyone was hurt by his comments, but said he would not apologise for what he said.

He started the ‘It Gets Better’ campaign in order to counter homophobic bullying, and the many teenage suicides it occasioned.
If you watch the video, at least one of the students started walking out BEFORE he said "we can ignore the bullshit". All he said at that point was that some people use the bible to justify homophobia.


So how much of this was Savage's fault and how much is an over-reaction to some hurt feelings among a few teens? Looks to me like most of the audience stayed for his entire speech and even applauded.
__________________
"As long as there’s one person on earth who remembers you, it isn’t over." - Oscar Hammerstein
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Yay!:
1 User Laughed:
3 Users Said Thanks :
Old 04-30-2012, 10:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Imp
 
Gabriell Anatra's Avatar
Who are you?
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Somewhere else.
Posts: 2,297
SL Join Date: Early '06 or late '05, not sure.
Client: Singularity
"We can learn to ignore the bull---t in the Bible about gay people."

If that is so deeply offensive as to inspire someone to walk out crying then they are probably roadkill on the streets of life anyway.

I get more offensive statements on a more or less constant basis. Most everyone I know does, for that matter.

They need to grow a spine.
Gabriell Anatra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
"jon" he does it!!
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Offaly, Republic of Ireland
Posts: 16,827
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Client: Phoenix & imprudence
They went with the full intention of being offended. twits. If their fathers spent less time being a republican arsehole and more time being a father they wouldn't be the twisted little fucks they are now.
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Likes This:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
It seems to me they got butthurt over the words "bullshit" and "bible" being used in the same sentence and failed to parse what he meant.

Of course, it could be that some of them believe there is no bullshit in the Bible at all. Those people are the future of the evangelical movement.
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:19 AM   #5 (permalink)
Particle Laboratory Elf
 
Jopsy Pendragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hillcrest, San Diego, USA
Posts: 5,567
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Jan 15 2004
Business: Light Sorcery
The pansy-assed comment was dead on and directed at people who can't take what they dish out.

Judge not, lest ye be judged and all that. Condemn others? Expect them to condemn you right back.
Jopsy Pendragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Amity Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,041
If you want to actually communicate with Christians about these issues, you do it in a way that respects their holy book. He went on a three minute rant about how the Bible justifies all sorts of social evils. It was his intent not to have a serious discussion, but to offend the Christians in the group and he got what he wanted. Clearly, he thinks the best way to reduce homophobia is by fighting a culture war.
Amity Slade is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
He held a three minute discussion covering the myriad hypocrisies in the Bible that Christians ignore daily and questioned why, then, they insist on pointing to the one line complaining about homosexuality like they have no choice in the matter.

Only the most thin-skinned Christian would consider that a "culture war."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teeny Leviathan View Post
Those Super Gays are as tough as a T-800 terminator and they are gay.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:28 AM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Curmudgeon

*SLU Supporter*
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,627
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2006
Client: v3 + Starlight
If the point of the "It Gets Better" campaign is to help teens teetering on the edge of suicide, I fail to see how this rant did anything other than make their situation worse. Some of the Chritians in that audience are probably gay, but they're not going to be dragged over the line of self-acceptance by being told their beliefs are bullshit. Yes, they are bullshit, but a slap in the face isn't going to open their ears.

There is a time and place for righteous indignation and rage in activism -- and god knows I've been there -- but this particular venue required a different touch. I was deeply involved with my college gay speakers bureau in both undergraduate and graduate school; confrontation was not the tactic I ever used when trying to bridge the gap of understanding. This doesn't mean you have to be wishy-washy and subservient; it does mean that you try to touch people's humanity and show them a perspective they've never considered before.
__________________
Noob: "okay.... im in a house with cages and people in gags and the door just locked and i cant get out :c"
Beebo Brink is offline   Reply With Quote
4 Users Agreed:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:30 AM   #9 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amity Slade View Post
If you want to actually communicate with Christians about these issues, you do it in a way that respects their holy book. He went on a three minute rant about how the Bible justifies all sorts of social evils. It was his intent not to have a serious discussion, but to offend the Christians in the group and he got what he wanted. Clearly, he thinks the best way to reduce homophobia is by fighting a culture war.
He's also told how he has been physically beaten in the past for his homosexuality. I cannot blame him for not feeling charitable.

Sometimes, challenging people's beliefs may offend but it's a sure thing that playing footsie with fundamentalists won't make them think. I'm not sure anything can cause that to happen (it's more of an individual internal, mental metamorphosis), but if someone criticizing your special book makes you cry you really DO need to rethink things.
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:31 AM   #10 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
Of the many things Dan Savage has said over the years that I thought inappropriate and/or offensive, I'm afraid I can't rank this one particularly high.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:33 AM   #11 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beebo Brink View Post
If the point of the "It Gets Better" campaign is to help teens teetering on the edge of suicide, I fail to see how this rant did anything other than make their situation worse. Some of the Chritians in that audience are probably gay, but they're not going to be dragged over the line of self-acceptance by being told their beliefs are bullshit. Yes, they are bullshit, but a slap in the face isn't going to open their ears.

There is a time and place for righteous indignation and rage in activism -- and god knows I've been there -- but this particular venue required a different touch. I was deeply involved with my college gay speakers bureau in both undergraduate and graduate school; confrontation was not the tactic I ever used when trying to bridge the gap of understanding. This doesn't mean you have to wishy-washy and subservient; it does mean that you try to touch people's humanity and show them a perspective they've never considered before.
No question, Beebo. I agree, but at the same time I question why anyone would schedule a known activist who has been outspoken and controversial in the past (far more than this speech), and expect him to be appropriate for high school kids.

These weren't undergrads or graduate students. They were high schoolers. Why is all the controversy over his words (taken out of context) and not the thought process of the organizers?

The answer to that one lies in the list of people making it a big deal - Fox News, for starters.
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
1 User Likes This:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:33 AM   #12 (permalink)
Senior Curmudgeon

*SLU Supporter*
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,627
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2006
Client: v3 + Starlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
He's also told how he has been physically beaten in the past for his homosexuality. I cannot blame him for not feeling charitable.
Speaking engagements with the public -- especially in a high school setting -- are not the place to work out your personal resentments, no matter how valid they may be.

Describing his experiences about being beaten, asking how this in keeping with the beliefs people hold about fairness and compassion, would go a long way to making even thin-skinned butt-hurt prone fundamentalists think twice about their actions.
Beebo Brink is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:35 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Curmudgeon

*SLU Supporter*
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 13,627
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2006
Client: v3 + Starlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
Of the many things Dan Savage has said over the years that I thought inappropriate and/or offensive, I'm afraid I can't rank this one particularly high.
I haven't a clue who this guy is, so I'm just judging this incident as described. Not an end-of-the-world scenario by any means, but hardly a success story either.
Beebo Brink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Amity Slade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
He's also told how he has been physically beaten in the past for his homosexuality. I cannot blame him for not feeling charitable.

Sometimes, challenging people's beliefs may offend but it's a sure thing that playing footsie with fundamentalists won't make them think. I'm not sure anything can cause that to happen (it's more of an individual internal, mental metamorphosis), but if someone criticizing your special book makes you cry you really DO need to rethink things.
You do not challenge someone's beliefs or have a serious discussion with them by disrespecting them. You can only have serious dialog with some sort of mutual respect. Or at least trying to pretend there is some respect. Without it, there are just pointless fights.

It upsets me when people attack that which I hold dear, and telling me how pathetic or stupid I am for it doesn't really change things.
Amity Slade is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Groaned:
1 User Agreed:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:40 AM   #15 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beebo Brink View Post
Speaking engagements with the public -- especially in a high school setting -- are not the place to work out your personal resentments, no matter how valid they may be.

Describing his experiences about being beaten, asking how this in keeping with the beliefs people hold about fairness and compassion, would go a long way to making even thin-skinned butt-hurt prone fundamentalists think twice about their actions.
That's how you and I would probably handle it. But we're talking about the man who licked doorknobs when he had the flu, as a way of sabotaging Republican Gary Bauer's office. He claims he licked everything - staplers, phones, keyboards. I sense a man motivated by extreme rage. Not someone who ought to be a spokesman against anti-gay bullying.
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 04-30-2012, 10:40 AM   #16 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amity Slade View Post
You do not challenge someone's beliefs or have a serious discussion with them by disrespecting them. You can only have serious dialog with some sort of mutual respect. Or at least trying to pretend there is some respect.
Much like when I encounter Gorean slavegirls on leashes being driven by their "Masters," I'm not obligated to participate in anyone else's roleplay without my consent.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:43 AM   #17 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
That's how you and I would probably handle it. But we're talking about the man who licked doorknobs at the Republic convention in Iowa when he had the flu, as a way of sabotaging Gary Bauer's office. He claims he licked everything - staplers, phones, keyboards. I sense a man motivated by extreme rage. Not someone who ought to be a spokesman against anti-gay bullying.
Ah, but that's only if you take the anti-gay bullying initiative in the context of "let's all hold hands and sing and the world can be a better place." Dan Savage is an activist from the ACT UP era when drag queens stormed press conferences and demanded that politicians provide AIDS funding when Regan was telling the world that it was just a disease for homosexuals. He's never been shy about wanting to fight back, and while I often dislike a lot of things he says I certainly can't fault him for wanting to spit in the face of straight people saying that we'd get rights if only we were meek and polite when we asked.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:47 AM   #18 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amity Slade View Post
You do not challenge someone's beliefs or have a serious discussion with them by disrespecting them. You can only have serious dialog with some sort of mutual respect. Or at least trying to pretend there is some respect. Without it, there are just pointless fights.

It upsets me when people attack that which I hold dear, and telling me how pathetic or stupid I am for it doesn't really change things.
I refuse to feign respect for ideologies I do not respect. But that's different from being civil.

What's happened here is instructive: by using the words "bullshit" and "bible" in the same sentence, his real message is being overlooked for the inflammatory parts.

What he was saying in the video was that it makes no sense to hold up the parts of Leviticus that agree with someone's homophobia while ignoring the parts that call for animal sacrifices, punishing men who have sex with menstruating women, killing blasphemers and other nonsense.

That's actually a valid, thought-provoking point but it's buried now under the "bullshit" red flag.
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:47 AM   #19 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
I certainly can't fault him for wanting to spit in the face of straight people saying that we'd get rights if only we were meek and polite when we asked.
I think that's kind of what I've been saying
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:49 AM   #20 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
I think the gay rights movement needs a bit more extreme rage. But my problem with Dan Savage has always been that he's much too Entitled White Male.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:50 AM   #21 (permalink)
I see what you're doing!
 
Sally Rosebud's Avatar
Whatcha lookin' at?
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southeast US
Posts: 312
My Mood:
SL Join Date: April 18, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Send a message via Skype™ to Sally Rosebud
When my cousin can tell everyone in our family that she is gay, then I'll start worrying about Christians being offended by somebody challenging their story book beliefs.
Sally Rosebud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:52 AM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mr Twine's Avatar
Why are you downside up?
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 429
I kinda suspect a good number of people had walked out, even if the word "bullshit" had been replaced with... oh I don't know, "nonsense", "silly things", "balderdash"...
Mr Twine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:53 AM   #23 (permalink)
Lustful Cockmonster

*SLU Supporter*
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 51,807
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 2004
Blog Entries: 1
It was like five or six people out of three thousand who walked out.
Joshua Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2012, 10:56 AM   #24 (permalink)
E=mc^(OMG)/wtf

*SLU Supporter*
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
Free's Sister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brownbackistan
Posts: 27,464
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005
Client: Firestorm
Blog Entries: 16

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
It was like five or six people out of three thousand who walked out.
Close. I didn't count but in the video, there might have been 20-ish or so.

Nobody talked much about the kids who stayed and applauded.
Cindy Claveau is online now   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 04-30-2012, 11:08 AM   #25 (permalink)
My Own Girl

*SLU Supporter*
 
Roxanne Blue's Avatar
Volunteered for This
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: the Edge of the Earth...
Posts: 5,389
My Mood:
SL Join Date: Jan 30, 2009
Blog Entries: 28
As someone who campaigns against hate speech and bullying, he might come across as less of a hypocrite if he avoided using such terms himself.

Quote:
After many students walked out of the speech, one of whom appeared to be crying, Savage said, “It’s funny, as someone who’s on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the bible, how pansy-assed some people react when you push back.”
Having been called a "pansy" more than once in my life by homophobes, I'm pretty sure it was not a term of endearment.
__________________
"I see you and acknowledge that you're in my vicinity. You are not a threat, so I won't kill you."

"Good. Same here." - Beebo Brink
.
Roxanne Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On