Church of England apologises to Darwin - SLUniverse Forums
 
Navigation » SLUniverse Forums > Community Discussion > Off Topic > Politics, Religion & Society » Church of England apologises to Darwin


Politics, Religion & Society Topics pertaining to politics, religion, philosophy, and social issues. Not for the faint of heart. Also, do not post while drunk, suffering from food poisoning, or while on a low carb diet. You have been warned.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-15-2008, 06:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
worried
 
Mukatsuku's Avatar
home
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 兵庫、日本
Posts: 8,857
My Mood:
Church of England apologises to Darwin

The CoE has apologised to Darwin for criticising his theory of evolution, in a move to show people that they also think the intelligent design brigade are a bunch of nutters.

Church makes ‘ludicrous’ apology to Charles Darwin - 126 years after his death | Mail Online

Quote:
The officials said that senior bishops wanted to atone for the vilification their predecessors heaped on Darwin in the 1860s, when he put forward his theory that man was descended from apes.

The Church is also anxious to counter the view that its teaching is incompatible with science. It wants to distance itself from fundamentalist Christians, who believe in the Biblical account of the creation of the world in seven days.
Good news about this is that in England, the creationists will never succeed in getting evolution taken out of schools now that even the church says creationism isn't the truth.
__________________
--

My Sims Exchange - http://www.thesims3.com/mypage/Mukatsuku

My Photography/Graphics Design - http://www.zedpeejay.com

Meet-me wiki - http://meetme-english.wetpaint.com

Mukatsuku is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 09-15-2008, 06:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,322
Did ole Charlie accept?
Walker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 06:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
Kitten Fuzz
 
Lo Jacobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,546
SL Join Date: May 2004
Business: Church of Luxe
Blog Entries: 17

Awards: 1
Special Achievement in Thread Titling 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walker Moore View Post
Did ole Charlie accept?
I guess you can ask him when you're dead.

Oh wait, probably not
__________________
MY STORE//MY BLOG//FLICKR//EMAIL
Lo Jacobs is offline   Reply With Quote
3 Users Laughed:
Old 09-15-2008, 06:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
worried
 
Mukatsuku's Avatar
home
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 兵庫、日本
Posts: 8,857
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walker Moore View Post
Did ole Charlie accept?
His great-great-grandson said it was ludicrous because they are apologising too late
Mukatsuku is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Laughed:
Old 09-15-2008, 06:31 PM   #5 (permalink)
is chasing her tail
 
Arilynn's Avatar
Ninja of love
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,031
SL Join Date: July 3, 2008
Business: Wandering about in a daze. Tabbing out.
Blog Entries: 5

Awards: 1
Special Achievement in LOLZ 
If people spoke English there, I would move in a minute.
Arilynn is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Laughed:
Old 09-15-2008, 06:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Joie de vivre!
 
Richie Waves's Avatar
Is Three apples Tall
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Between Iraq and Israel
Posts: 8,990
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Thank Christ for sanity, its late in the day to be apologising to Darwin, but the statement it makes is gold!
__________________
My lastfm


Oooh, Betty! the cat did a shit in the hat



Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 09-15-2008, 06:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Queen of the Metaverse
 
Aimee Weber's Avatar
Edit Status
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,265
My Mood:
An apology is nice (though Darwin's great grandson, Andrew Darwin, called the gesture "pointless" and believes it has more to do with reforming the CoE's image than to make genuine amends) but you know what would be even better ...

... for the Church to promise that the next time scientists publish theories and ideas that may contradict Church doctrine based on a formidable amount of evidence, they will scrutinize the theory scientifically with empirical evidence in a rational scientific way rather than demonizing, obfuscating, misrepresenting and/or silencing them.

But I do mean it when I say kudos to the CoE on this one. I'm looking forward to when American fundamentalists join the sanity.
Aimee Weber is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Laughed:
Old 09-15-2008, 08:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
exp(ln(Gearhead))
 
Aodhan McDunnough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 5,842
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: March 28, 2006
Business: Aodhan's Forge
Blog Entries: 2
Well the Catholic Church also somewhat recently forgave Galileo for supporting the Copernican (heliocentric) model of the solar system over the Ptolemaic geocentric model.

Still a good move. It might be pointless to the Darwins, but it's not just an image thing. When the religious hierarchy makes such a pronouncement, it filters to a large part of the congregation. Even if the majority have long adopted that evolution is not only real, but it also not truly in conflict with the faith, it still matters that the Church says it explicitly.
Aodhan McDunnough is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 10:18 AM   #9 (permalink)
worried
 
Mukatsuku's Avatar
home
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 兵庫、日本
Posts: 8,857
My Mood:
Just adding an update - the CoE is going even further and totally slamming creationists and will publish a website saying Darwin is right and is what should be taught in schools. They are worried by people like Palin who try to stop people learning.

Quote:
Anglican leaders fear that “noisy” advocates of a literal interpretation of the Bible - especially in the United States, where even the Republican vice-presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, is a vocal supporter - are infecting the perception of Christianity worldwide.
Quote:
The Rev Dr Malcolm Brown, one of the inspirations for the website, said: “We felt there would be public interest, particularly because of the rise of creationism in the US.
They still want the idea of creationism taught, but not as a science as they don't agree with it being literal.

Quote:
A church spokesman added: “Creationism should not be taught as a scientifically based theory but could be included in discussion of the development of scientific ideas down the ages or in RE.”
So, the CoE thinks Palin is nuts cool
Mukatsuku is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Laughed:
Old 09-16-2008, 10:18 AM   #10 (permalink)
worried
 
Mukatsuku's Avatar
home
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 兵庫、日本
Posts: 8,857
My Mood:
Oops, forgot linky
Anglicans back Darwin over 'noisy' creationists -Times Online
Mukatsuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 10:58 AM   #11 (permalink)
Quack!
 
Ewan Took's Avatar
............
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: .........
Posts: 2,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mukatsuku View Post
Just adding an update - the CoE is going even further and totally slamming creationists and will publish a website saying Darwin is right and is what should be taught in schools. They are worried by people like Palin who try to stop people learning.




They still want the idea of creationism taught, but not as a science as they don't agree with it being literal.



So, the CoE thinks Palin is nuts cool
It's insane that science has to defend itself against
the creationists.

It's like the last 500 years never happened.
__________________
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
Ewan Took is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 09-16-2008, 11:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
Cheap but never free
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
"-ish"
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,554
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ewan Took View Post
It's insane that science has to defend itself against
the creationists.

It's like the last 500 years never happened.
Science is fully capable of defending itself - when your position is based on evidence and testing, and you're willing to adapt to new evidence, that's not the issue. But it's difficult to convince people who simply don't listen or refuse to understand what you're saying.

Just once in my last decade of discussing evolution on the web, I'd have loved to encounter a creationist who didn't misrepresent science and evolution. But they're batting 1.00 so far, as every single one of them has been jousting with their own half-baked, ill-informed version of evolution rather than the real Theory of Evolution. I guess maybe it's easier to knock down that way?
__________________
Sometimes, "I hit it with my axe" is the best solution.
Cindy Claveau is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Agreed:
Old 09-16-2008, 11:10 AM   #13 (permalink)
Queen of the Metaverse
 
Aimee Weber's Avatar
Edit Status
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,265
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
Just once in my last decade of discussing evolution on the web, I'd have loved to encounter a creationist who didn't misrepresent science and evolution. But they're batting 1.00 so far, as every single one of them has been jousting with their own half-baked, ill-informed version of evolution rather than the real Theory of Evolution. I guess maybe it's easier to knock down that way?
You know, the theory that we're all just a bunch of monkeys *IS* just a theory. You know that right? Kind of like that time somebody was eating my lunch at work, and I had a theory that it was Stu from accounting. But it wasn't. It was Eric from Technical Support. Evolution is the same thing.

Now Eric ... *HE'S* a monkey.
Aimee Weber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 11:13 AM   #14 (permalink)
Cheap but never free
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
"-ish"
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,554
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aimee Weber View Post
You know, the theory that we're all just a bunch of monkeys *IS* just a theory.

Cindy Claveau is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Laughed:
Old 09-16-2008, 02:44 PM   #15 (permalink)
worried
 
Mukatsuku's Avatar
home
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 兵庫、日本
Posts: 8,857
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
Sorry, but I don't believe they are in our evolutionary line
Mukatsuku is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Laughed:
Old 09-16-2008, 06:58 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
detrius's Avatar
notorious subversive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,302
My Mood:
Three predictions:
  1. The Church of England will backpedal, officials will put out a statement, shrouding the position of their church in vagueness.
  2. American Creationists will come up with a bunch of creative arguments for why Anglicans aren't "True Christians".
  3. Ben Stein will make a new documentary, reminding everyone of how the first European colonists in North America were persecuted by the Church of England, underlining his message with pictures of worn-out people and somehow attributing the course of history to the Theory of Evolution.


"Those poor people! Look at what Darwin did to them!"
__________________
"V Pravde net izvestiy, v Izvestiyakh net pravdy."

Last edited by detrius; 09-16-2008 at 07:16 PM.
detrius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 07:02 PM   #17 (permalink)
worried
 
Mukatsuku's Avatar
home
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 兵庫、日本
Posts: 8,857
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by detrius View Post
Three predictions:
  1. The Church of England will backpedal, officials will put out a statement, shrouding the position of their church in vagueness.
  2. American Creationists will come up with a bunch of creative arguments for why Anglicans aren't "True Christians".
  3. Ben Stein will make a new documentary, reminding everyone of how the first European colonists in North America were persecuted by the Church of England, underlining his message with pictures of worn-out people.

Bush will use this in his next speech to prove that Britain is not the US's ally and needs to be invaded since they are polluting All-American Christian beliefs (ie, for All-American read "what Georgie boy believes because not believing him is unpatriotic")
Mukatsuku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 07:07 PM   #18 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
detrius's Avatar
notorious subversive
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,302
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mukatsuku View Post
Bush will use this in his next speech to prove that Britain is not the US's ally and needs to be invaded since they are polluting All-American Christian beliefs (ie, for All-American read "what Georgie boy believes because not believing him is unpatriotic")
The only thing Bush is going to do for the rest of his life is cutting mesquite on his farm in Texas, strictly isolated from the rest of the world so he can continue living in his bubble. Don't expect anything relevant from him for the rest of his Presidency.
detrius is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 09-16-2008, 08:17 PM   #19 (permalink)
Senior Member

SLU Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,605
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 1
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
I really don't understand how the church can turn its back on creationism. What are they going to teach the kiddies in Sunday School? Are they planning on ignoring Genesis?
__________________

Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 08:20 PM   #20 (permalink)
archived
 
Ingrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,096
SLShopper Ads: 7

Awards: 1
Posting While Intoxicated 
I still don't understand how they got the dinosaurs on the boat.
Ingrid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 08:27 PM   #21 (permalink)
Joie de vivre!
 
Richie Waves's Avatar
Is Three apples Tall
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Between Iraq and Israel
Posts: 8,990
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
I really don't understand how the church can turn its back on creationism. What are they going to teach the kiddies in Sunday School? Are they planning on ignoring Genesis?
They don't need to be incompatible... that's whats so fucking annoying...
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Agreed:
Old 09-16-2008, 08:34 PM   #22 (permalink)
Senior Member

SLU Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,605
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 1
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ingrid View Post
I still don't understand how they got the dinosaurs on the boat.
The Dinosaurs were already gone.
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 08:36 PM   #23 (permalink)
Senior Member

SLU Supporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,605
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 1
SL Join Date: 03/17/2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Waves View Post
They don't need to be incompatible... that's whats so fucking annoying...

Evolutionists seem to deem creation as completely impossible, but creationist are support to accept evolution. They do seem incompatible of one is treated as completely ridiculous and the people that believe it are bible thumping idiots.
Eboni Khan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 09:03 PM   #24 (permalink)
Joie de vivre!
 
Richie Waves's Avatar
Is Three apples Tall
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Between Iraq and Israel
Posts: 8,990
SL Join Date: 27/06/2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
Evolutionists seem to deem creation as completely impossible, but creationist are support to accept evolution. They do seem incompatible of one is treated as completely ridiculous and the people that believe it are bible thumping idiots.
Well, we are looking for the "God particle"
Richie Waves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 09:08 PM   #25 (permalink)
exp(ln(Gearhead))
 
Aodhan McDunnough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 5,842
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: March 28, 2006
Business: Aodhan's Forge
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eboni Khan View Post
I really don't understand how the church can turn its back on creationism. What are they going to teach the kiddies in Sunday School? Are they planning on ignoring Genesis?
"Let there be light" = Big Bang

Plants appeared, then animals appeared, then man appeared = Evolution

"Adam" = Man
"Eve" = Life

Genesis was written by Moses for an audience that doesn't even know what a planet is. Don't expect him to write like Einstein. God is wise, He knows how not to write. We learned evolution in science class, along with that we learned critical thinking. There is no conflict between Genesis and Evolution at all.

The Church (Catholic) as it stands I don't think is Creationist, and I don't think the CoE at present is much different. I was Catholic educated btw and Creation was never forced down our throats, not for a second in my 17 years of education.

Last edited by Aodhan McDunnough; 09-16-2008 at 09:24 PM.
Aodhan McDunnough is online now   Reply With Quote
2 Users Agreed:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On