| Off Topic Discussion forum for topics not directly related to Second Life. |
| |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| The Fourth Dimension ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I think RealPlayer 11 sucks. RealPlayer 10 was a really good piece of software. It loaded very quickly and just did the job really efficiently. It was the most efficient player out there that had the kind of options it had (I've love its ability to rewind streams). So then they release v11. What a piece of bloatware crap. It takes anywhere between 8-15 seconds to load up, and then once you've loaded an audio file into it after it first loads, it takes 5 seconds for it to actually start playing the song. I'm sorry, but that's crap. Its only redeeming option is how it adds a context menu to videos playing in your browser so you can "download this video". Nice option, I'll give them that. If you have the latest and greatest machine, maybe RealPlayer 11 will be okay for you. If you're one of those people that don't mind having extra programs running in the background, I believe there are some options to make it "quick load" so it's always loaded into memory so when you do access it, it will happen quickly. If that kind of thing works for you, then maybe RealPlayer 11 will be a good thing for you. I'm not one of those people--I don't like anything extra to run if I'm not currently using it. Call me obsessive. Anyway, another thing about RP11 is that you have to uncheck a couple things when you're installing it or you'll get the Google toolbar and some other crap. At least it isn't the awful Yahoo toolbar, but still, and at least they give you the option of not installing them, unlike some of their tactics from v7 and earlier. I've given RealPlayer 11 a test run for two weeks, and I'm going to be uninstalling it to put v10 back on because I like to hear an audio file within 5 seconds after clicking it, not 15-25 seconds. What is your experience with this?
__________________ |
| | |
| 1 User Agreed: |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Account Closed | Quote:
It annoys me no end that the BBC still use it for regional news bulletins, despite everything else being ported to the iPlayer. I bet you still have to put in a fake email address and fake password when you first run it too. Mine goes something like this: Email address: adsfasdfkjlgfkwiodakl@adfkalwklekljadfds.com Password: adkfkdfjaqadfasddfalkjadsf I'd love to know what Real's database tables look like after 10+ years of users doing that upon installation of every version of their software. I can't be the only person who entered a load of gibberish because I just wanted to play the damn media file that somebody stupidly encoded with Real Encoder. I haven't even bothered installing it since I got Vista. It makes me angry. | |
| | |
| 4 Users Laughed: |
| 4 Users Agreed: |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Behind You
Posts: 4,317
My Mood: SL Join Date: June 12, 2003 XBOX Leaderboard: 4th | I'm not sure any can do that unless it somehow records the stream. At least I've never heard of such a thing. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| The Fourth Dimension ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
As far as WinAmp, that's just about as bloated as RealPlayerV11--it takes just as long to load and to finally start playing a song. You have to shut off at least 4 options to make it act like a normal player and not bring up a popup window near the icon notification tray every time the song changes and not try to run in the background all the time. At least it has the options to change though, and at least WinAmp handles 24 bit wav files--it's the only one I know of that handles those. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| The Fourth Dimension ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Don't you just love how they set it up so if you disable it from starting in msconfig, it just makes another copy of itself so you HAVE to remove it from the registry to keep it from loading..... or you can remove the qttask.exe file altogether, but potentially that could cause program functionality problems.... | |
| | |
| 1 User Laughed: |
| 4 Users Agreed: |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Account Closed | If Quicktime and Safari for the PC have taught me anything, it's that Apple lack considerable clue. You'd think they'd work on that if they really want to convince PC users that Macs are the way to go. Even as I type, there is a vulnerability in Safari for the PC that's so serious, users would be best uninstalling it altogether. Apple are happy to leave it unpatched for the time being though. ![]() ETA: http://www.macworld.com/article/1338...ttackcode.html MS actually patched their side of the problem today, and advised people to avoid Safari until Apple patch their code. |
| | |
| 1 User Said Thanks: |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| The Fourth Dimension ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
(Apple rant removed) Last edited by Fmeh; 06-11-2008 at 04:22 PM. | |
| | |
| 4 Users Agreed: |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Hi there! ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Location: Darkmere 4 life and shnizzle
Posts: 547
My Mood: | Real Alternative installs codecs for Media Player Classic, so you get Realplayer compatibility within Media Player Classic, I use this all the time now, they also do a Quick Time version, so Quicktime runs on Media Player Classic if you like. No bloat, and you can view real Player files. http://www.free-codecs.com/download/...lternative.htm |
| | |
| 5 Users Said Thanks : |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Beeble Bubble Bimbo
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Darkmere
Posts: 3,884
My Mood: SLShopper Ads: 22 SL Join Date: October 24, 2006
Business: Cortech Enterprises | Free-Codecs.com :: Download Real Alternative 1.80 : Real Alternative will allow you to play RealMedia files without having to install RealPlayer/RealOne Player Or what Smokergirl said. I also use this instead of Acrobat Reader: http://www.foxitsoftware.com/pdf/rd_intro.php Foxit isn't all bloaty for simply reading a pdf online. Last edited by Beezle Warburton; 07-02-2008 at 01:10 AM. |
| | |
| 1 User Agreed: |
| | #18 (permalink) | ||
| Account Closed | Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| Account Closed | It's very cool! The performance gains are pretty obvious across the board, from the time it takes to login, to the responsiveness of your favourite applications... but I'm aware it can cause problems on low memory/single core systems if you commonly use applications with big memory footprints. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| Banned
adores her psycho
| whats so cool about having half your progs preloaded into memory eating at performance? id rather wait a few more seconds for a program to start than run 24/7 with it cached in memory. sounds pretty evil to me. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) | |
| Account Closed | Quote:
Also, if you're not using those extra GBs of memory, then why not let the OS utilize them to improve performance? If Superfetch really was dumb enough to keep the same programs in memory 24/7, detrimentally affecting the performance of any demanding applications I cared to use, then I'd have switched back to XP long ago. As it happens, Superfetch is one feature that would seriously prevent me returning to XP. It is now time for you to groan, my dear. | |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Professor of ZOMG ![]() ![]() ![]()
An Internet Telebrity...
Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,204
My Mood: SLShopper Ads: 3 SL Join Date: August 2004 | Quote:
Did Philip Rosedale go back to Real Networks??
__________________ ![]() Flickr Stream: Mission Home Store Flickr Photos Blog:Mission Home Store Blog PLURK: Follow Me on PLURK | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |