Lalinda Lovell Child Sex / Content Thief - Page 5 - SLUniverse Forums
 
Navigation » SLUniverse Forums > Community Discussion > General SL Discussion » Lalinda Lovell Child Sex / Content Thief


General SL Discussion Discuss topics related to Second Life

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2008, 12:26 PM   #101 (permalink)
Banned
 
ruby tuesday's Avatar
Come sit on my lap.
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,432
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 1
p.s - i think w-hat did a tour once of Lalinda Lovell's place

it was...umm....nauseating?
__________________
"I don't know Ruby well and so I wouldn't until I knew her boundaries."

"She has none."

"I don't think that is quite correct - rather, they are infinitely expanding."


ruby tuesday is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:29 PM   #102 (permalink)
Undercompensating
 
Ingrid N's Avatar
4 ears to hear you better
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,214
My Mood:
Business: liminal.
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy Vogel View Post
However, I do not understand this mentality: oh well if they can have child avatars they can dwell on the theme, and then decide to do it for real thing. If a child molester is going to go and take advantage of a child they just do it, they don't get online and spend hours pretending to do it.
Do you think all pedophiles are a-ok with their own urges? No, no they aren't. Please, it's not like they're some sort of mythical rape-monster, but don't you think that maybe having sex with a virtual representation of a child who is really into the sex and then hopping off to, I don't know, wherever ageplayers used to hang out, and getting feedback from people who also fantasize about having sex with children might, I don't know, get them to think that maybe molesting a child might not be so bad after all.[/quote]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy Vogel View Post
It's just like people who always talk about suicide, 99% of the time; They are full of crap. People who mean to end it, really end it, nice and clean without bothering anyone irrevocably (pills + gasoline + gun -- yes I am exaggerating). No one that's in it for real takes a whole bottle of sleeping pills and then calls their girlfriend in panic in a hour.
Oh please. That's such a cliché. about 50 or so percent of people who actually successfully commit suicide reach out to people beforehand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy Vogel View Post
What I am saying is.... it boggles my mind how we worry so much about some boxos getting on here and playing house when our children are playing with semi automatic gun replicas on the street, playing violent kill-em-all games on their computers. If the same logic is used aren't our children just practicing to become mass killers?

What's wrong here?
If I had a 10 year old child it wouldn't be allowed to play GTA 4, if you mean that. Preteens especially react very strongly to violence shown on TV or in video games directly after viewing (ie. act more aggressively), though I have no idea if any long term studies exist for that kind of thing.

Basically, what I'm saying is, parents who buy their kids M-rated games cause they are too young to buy them themselves are idiots.
__________________
liminal.: Skins & AOs! More fun than a subincision!
Ingrid N is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:34 PM   #103 (permalink)
Undercompensating
 
Ingrid N's Avatar
4 ears to hear you better
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,214
My Mood:
Business: liminal.
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruby tuesday View Post
See, I wasn't going to say anything because child sex roleplay threads make me but I often wonder how many of these cock slabs log off of SL and go molest RL children.

Ugh, I feel sick. Exiting thread now.
To be fair, he never said he wanted to molest her, but the way he casually talked about how hot his recent RP with someone was after mentioning his daughter made me cringe.
Ingrid N is offline  
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 02-26-2008, 12:37 PM   #104 (permalink)
Professor of ZOMG
 
Troy Vogel's Avatar
An Internet Telebrity...
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,204
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 3
SL Join Date: August 2004
Ingrid, believe me I agree with you mostly...

I don't think child molesters practice per se. Most of them just do it. And they're not always some creepy guy by himself in his bedroom logged into SL.

It's usually the uncle that's staying with your family, the father in law, the cousin that's 10 years older, the trusted babysitter neighbor's husband.

I know there's a lot of media attention on these serial child molesters but I am telling you they're the tip of the iceberg, there's a whole unspoken epidemic of this stuff going on in most families behind closed doors, and inside minds that remember what happened but could not tell anyone in the family.

I think shows like "catch a predator" are painting a way too polarized, unrealistic picture of what a child molester is. It's just not that simple -- it's not a serial killer, demonlike crazy person. It is a lot more sinister than that.

As for SL, it is a crapshoot. I really can not give you any suggestions for cleaning this place up. It's like the internet, there IS NO cleaning it up entirely.
__________________

Flickr Stream: Mission Home Store Flickr Photos
Blog:Mission Home Store Blog
PLURK: Follow Me on PLURK
Troy Vogel is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:38 PM   #105 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Ryozu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Waves View Post
Psychology Today states that one of the signs of a pedophile is:
“Recurrent, intense sexual fantasies, urges or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child (generally age 13 years or younger) for a period of at least 6 months.”
-http://psychologytoday.com/conditions/pedophilia.h tml

Thought that needed some bolding
Pedophilia isn't illegal.

Quote:
Sorry, but people without homosexual dispositions don't generally masturbate to depictions of men having sex with men, virtual or not.
Fixed.

Okay, seriously, vocal as I may be about the whole subject, the content of the argument has nothing to do with the thread. What SHOULD be pointed out is not what rule was broken but the fact that a rule was broken, and dozens upon dozens of ARs were filed without LL taking any action.

I swear, people have NO sense of objectivity these days.

Ten, you seriously need to drop the specifics of the ageplay thing. It hurts the story. This thread is proof of that. You reported a story about content theft and yet there's pages of arguments about ageplay... The entire point of the first post is lost in the dead horse beatings.
__________________

OmniPhaze: Personal Teleportation Attachment.
Get it from Omni Corporation
Ryozu is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:41 PM   #106 (permalink)
Professor of ZOMG
 
Troy Vogel's Avatar
An Internet Telebrity...
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,204
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 3
SL Join Date: August 2004
Ryozu:
Quote:
Sorry, but people without homosexual dispositions don't generally masturbate to depictions of men having sex with men, virtual or not.
Obviously you have not heard of the term HeteroFlexible.
Troy Vogel is offline  
3 Users Laughed:
Old 02-26-2008, 12:46 PM   #107 (permalink)
Member
 
Talon Lardner's Avatar
Had all his shots
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 78
My Mood:
SL Join Date: October 5, 2005
Send a message via ICQ to Talon Lardner Send a message via AIM to Talon Lardner Send a message via MSN to Talon Lardner Send a message via Yahoo to Talon Lardner
Personally, I'm still a bit skeptical about the whole correlation of one's fantasies extending into real life for ALL those involved (I don't think it extends as much as Ten implies), but I'm in agreement with Ryozu here. This ageplay stuffs isn't the story, this is about someone allegidly ripping content out of spite and protest of someone supporting a charity. That part really gets me angry, since I have a cousin who has autism so severe that he will never speak nor be able to live his life by himself... yes, Lovell, I'm sure he PERFERS to be like that, I'm SURE, Lovell, that he perfers being severely autistic than to be able to take care of himself.
__________________
My Snapzilla Pics... Why don't you swing by and say Hi?
http://www.sluniverse.com/pics/Defau...=Talon+Lardner
Talon Lardner is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 12:48 PM   #108 (permalink)
the bathwater & the baby
 
Malachi's Avatar
fish and bees are inherently sarcastic
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Waves View Post
Psychology Today states that one of the signs of a pedophile is:
“Recurrent, intense sexual fantasies, urges or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child (generally age 13 years or younger) for a period of at least 6 months.”
Alice had some trouble with this bit too:
`Do you mean that you think you can find out the answer to it?' said the March Hare.
`I do,' Alice hastily replied; `at least--at least I mean what I say--that's the same thing, you know.'
`Not the same thing a bit!' said the Hatter. `You might just as well say that "I see what I eat" is the same thing as "I eat what I see"!'
The assertion above should more accurately be stated:
Among known child molesters there are marked, recurrent, intense sexual fantasies, urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child...
No one would be capable of making the converse statement up top; to do so would require knowledge of all people who have fantasies about sex with children and whether or not that results - ultimately - in molestation. People wouldn't be that forthcoming with Psychology Today nor Kinsey and therein lies the crux. There is an implicit statement through this thread that ageplay is a "gateway" to molestation. That belief is redolent of thought police and that's what bothers some people.

Criminalizing thoughts and acts that see their expression between consenting adults is something that has long been a constitutional issue from Griswold v. Connecticut - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia where the US Supreme Court established the "right to privacy" (or in Brandeis' words, "The right to be let alone") including the more recent Lawrence v. Texas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia which overturned a sodomy law in a case involving consensual sex. One can argue that judicial activism or "legislating from the bench" applies here, but until you get your own court overruling one of the world's most conservative bodies, you have to abide by their decisions.
Malachi is offline  
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 02-26-2008, 12:54 PM   #109 (permalink)
Undercompensating
 
Ingrid N's Avatar
4 ears to hear you better
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,214
My Mood:
Business: liminal.
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy Vogel View Post
Ingrid, believe me I agree with you mostly...

I don't think child molesters practice per se. Most of them just do it. And they're not always some creepy guy by himself in his bedroom logged into SL.

It's usually the uncle that's staying with your family, the father in law, the cousin that's 10 years older, the trusted babysitter neighbor's husband.

I know there's a lot of media attention on these serial child molesters but I am telling you they're the tip of the iceberg, there's a whole unspoken epidemic of this stuff going on in most families behind closed doors, and inside minds that remember what happened but could not tell anyone in the family.

I think shows like "catch a predator" are painting a way too polarized, unrealistic picture of what a child molester is. It's just not that simple -- it's not a serial killer, demonlike crazy person. It is a lot more sinister than that.

As for SL, it is a crapshoot. I really can not give you any suggestions for cleaning this place up. It's like the internet, there IS NO cleaning it up entirely.
I'm not sure where you got that I disregard that about 80-90% of all molestations are done by a friend or family member, because I don't. Hence why I got so freaked out about the one ageplayer that I knew whom I know has a young daughter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryozu View Post
Fixed.
Yes, gay men occasionally watch gay porn. They might even rp gay sex on SL. A pedophile isn't defined by whether he has molested a child or not, he is defined by what he is attracted to.
Ingrid N is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:04 PM   #110 (permalink)
Doing stuff
 
WarKirby Magojiro's Avatar
Happles!
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 2,778
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 1
SL Join Date: 14/10/2006
Business: MagoTek Industries
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clancy Sullivan View Post
I will take a shot at opportunists in this thread who think ageplay should never have been banned in SL and think that this a yet another opportunity to replay all of the old tapes on that subject.
We're not oopportunists. This is Tenshi's fault. Including the second post about ageplay was a cheapshot at character asassination, and anyone with half a brain should have known how it would derail discussion.

It's the kind of thing I would expect from a local tabloid, looking for sensationalism. Not fair, unbiased journalism. This story is about content theft, and oposing opinions on autism. Tenshi chose to include ageplay, and it is on her head for the subsequent derailment of the discussion over it.
__________________
Wounds, both physical and mental, heal in time. bones reknit, therapy and drugs make you forget. Life goes on.
But nothing cures death. Please remember this.


Quote:
"Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams
himself your master."

Last edited by WarKirby Magojiro; 02-26-2008 at 01:28 PM.
WarKirby Magojiro is offline  
2 Users Groaned:
1 User Laughed:
5 Users Said Thanks :
Old 02-26-2008, 01:25 PM   #111 (permalink)
Member
 
Zachary Dumart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 44
My Mood:
See here's the thing.

As the lovely and vivacious Ingrid has pointed out: It's The Imagery, Stupid.

You can no more tell me that someone who ageplays is less likely to act on it in RL than you can say that someone who jacks it to Kiddie Porn is less likely to diddle their favorite niece. Is there a correlation? Can anyone get me a study? Because my gut says that if you're slappin' the salami to child porn, then there's a good chance that that's what you WANT - and you'd go for it if you knew you could get away with it.

Because men (who make up the vast majority of pedos) are extremely visual when it comes to sex. You do the ageplay thing, and you're watching a representation of a child doing the horizontal mambo with a grown up? That, my friends, is the consumption of kiddie porn.

And yes, I'm implying that if you're a guy who engages in Furry sex, that there's a chance you might look at the dog and go "Hmm..."

Lastly, the arguments that "Hey, i don't tell people how to live" is some kind of moral high ground is sheer bullshit. There are some lifestyles that are BAD FOR THE PEOPLE INVOLVED. Forcing women to wear beekeeper outfits in the Middle East comes to mind. So does Gor. And as long as I've got that Freedom Of Speech thing, I'm gonna point it out. That's MY lifestyle choice.

In conclusion - Ageplayers are pathetic worms. Small, meaningless people who are maladjusted and cracked in the head. And I'm gonna tell them that whenever I can.
Zachary Dumart is offline  
1 User Laughed:
Old 02-26-2008, 01:29 PM   #112 (permalink)
Ten
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,918
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 10/7/2006

Awards: 1
Thwarting a Potential Drama Attack 
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarKirby Magojiro View Post
This is Tenhi;'s fault. ...Tenshi chose to include ageplay, and it is on her head for the subsequent derailment of the discussion over it.




__________________

Shopping Cart Disco
http://www.shoppingcartdisco.com

THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES.
Ten is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:37 PM   #113 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,567
My Mood:
I'm trying to think of a way to phrase this objectively and I can't seem to.

I think that thoughts of having sex with children probably go through people's heads more often than is spoken of. I don't think those urges are relegated to a handful of comically evil fat balding men in Florida. I think it's frankly a lot more common than anyone realizes because you can't get onto this subject in almost any capacity before it becomes a free for all.

Instead we have a societal response which is a repression of its own, repression on the heads of anyone who thinks that way that they are depraved and sick and wrong and less than a human. Which gets internalized, layered upon and contributes to the breakdown of their psyche on different levels. The weaker ones break and give up and go target children, who then internalize and repress and feel ashamed to talk about it because as a society we think that all the pedophiles have bags of candy and red letters on their foreheads and never believe it's closer than that.

I don't think discussions like this are helpful. And further I think that this problem is a lot more common than probably anyone wants to admit to. Which leads to the prevalence of things like ageplay in SL. And child porn. Because you can't really repress things like this, you have to have an outlet or you end up a lecherous pedophile sneaking children away.

Again I'm not condoning it. As someone so affected by a neighbor when I was a kid I have some personal authority on this subject. I still say though that what consensual adults choose to do is that. And this is not a gateway to pedophilia, no more than video games are a gateway to murder. Someone who's going to fuck a kid will fuck a kid, SL isn't the only place to act it out. Someone who's going to kill someone else will do it, they don't need Grand Theft Auto.

But I think freaking out and acting aghast contributes to the problem. Someone can want to do something and understand they can't. But if you're afraid to talk about it with anyone because you see reactions like this, you won't talk about it, and you won't try to get help, and you won't try to control it, and it will instead eat away at you until you do actually hurt someone.

Is my opinion at least. I've almost exclusively only had sex with guys older than me though and kids annoy the hell out of me.
Joshua Nightshade is offline  
1 User Groaned:
3 Users Said Thanks :
Old 02-26-2008, 01:39 PM   #114 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,630
My Mood:
Business: Rollerskating

Awards: 1
Best User Title 
Manwhore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
I'm trying to think of a way to phrase this objectively and I can't seem to.

I think that thoughts of having sex with children probably go through people's heads more often than is spoken of. I don't think those urges are relegated to a handful of comically evil fat balding men in Florida. I think it's frankly a lot more common than anyone realizes because you can't get onto this subject in almost any capacity before it becomes a free for all.

Instead we have a societal response which is a repression of its own, repression on the heads of anyone who thinks that way that they are depraved and sick and wrong and less than a human. Which gets internalized, layered upon and contributes to the breakdown of their psyche on different levels. The weaker ones break and give up and go target children, who then internalize and repress and feel ashamed to talk about it because as a society we think that all the pedophiles have bags of candy and red letters on their foreheads and never believe it's closer than that.

I don't think discussions like this are helpful. And further I think that this problem is a lot more common than probably anyone wants to admit to. Which leads to the prevalence of things like ageplay in SL. And child porn. Because you can't really repress things like this, you have to have an outlet or you end up a lecherous pedophile sneaking children away.

Again I'm not condoning it. As someone so affected by a neighbor when I was a kid I have some personal authority on this subject. I still say though that what consensual adults choose to do is that. And this is not a gateway to pedophilia, no more than video games are a gateway to murder. Someone who's going to fuck a kid will fuck a kid, SL isn't the only place to act it out. Someone who's going to kill someone else will do it, they don't need Grand Theft Auto.

But I think freaking out and acting aghast contributes to the problem. Someone can want to do something and understand they can't. But if you're afraid to talk about it with anyone because you see reactions like this, you won't talk about it, and you won't try to get help, and you won't try to control it, and it will instead eat away at you until you do actually hurt someone.

Is my opinion at least. I've almost exclusively only had sex with guys older than me though and kids annoy the hell out of me.
Clancy Sullivan is offline  
1 User Laughed:
Old 02-26-2008, 01:43 PM   #115 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,567
My Mood:
Fuck off Clancy.
Joshua Nightshade is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:43 PM   #116 (permalink)
Ten
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,918
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 10/7/2006

Awards: 1
Thwarting a Potential Drama Attack 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
I'm trying to think of a way to phrase this objectively and I can't seem to.

I think that thoughts of having sex with children probably go through people's heads more often than is spoken of. I don't think those urges are relegated to a handful of comically evil fat balding men in Florida. I think it's frankly a lot more common than anyone realizes because you can't get onto this subject in almost any capacity before it becomes a free for all.

Instead we have a societal response which is a repression of its own, repression on the heads of anyone who thinks that way that they are depraved and sick and wrong and less than a human. Which gets internalized, layered upon and contributes to the breakdown of their psyche on different levels. The weaker ones break and give up and go target children, who then internalize and repress and feel ashamed to talk about it because as a society we think that all the pedophiles have bags of candy and red letters on their foreheads and never believe it's closer than that.

I don't think discussions like this are helpful. And further I think that this problem is a lot more common than probably anyone wants to admit to. Which leads to the prevalence of things like ageplay in SL. And child porn. Because you can't really repress things like this, you have to have an outlet or you end up a lecherous pedophile sneaking children away.

Again I'm not condoning it. As someone so affected by a neighbor when I was a kid I have some personal authority on this subject. I still say though that what consensual adults choose to do is that. And this is not a gateway to pedophilia, no more than video games are a gateway to murder. Someone who's going to fuck a kid will fuck a kid, SL isn't the only place to act it out. Someone who's going to kill someone else will do it, they don't need Grand Theft Auto.

But I think freaking out and acting aghast contributes to the problem. Someone can want to do something and understand they can't. But if you're afraid to talk about it with anyone because you see reactions like this, you won't talk about it, and you won't try to get help, and you won't try to control it, and it will instead eat away at you until you do actually hurt someone.

Is my opinion at least. I've almost exclusively only had sex with guys older than me though and kids annoy the hell out of me.



I love not having to argue till I'm blue in the face with New Josh and having New Josh put out his opinion kindly.


I'm from the group that says you govern your thoughts, and keep your actions from your thoughts clean... well, mostly. There are things that cross the line: rape, harassment, child pornography, beastiality... you know, the general "human ethics" rules. I think furries fall under beastiality.

Any of those things will cause me to cringe and I won't see nor listen to them. Josh, it's not normal for people to think about screwing children. It's just not. It's not even Freudian. And I'm sure if you look through history, you'll find
that people who screw children have been labeled "psychotic" and shunned.
Ten is offline  
1 User Laughed:
2 Users Said Thanks :
Old 02-26-2008, 01:47 PM   #117 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,567
My Mood:
I'm not saying it's normal. I'm saying it's probably a lot less uncommon than we think. If there's any lesson to be learned by shows like To Catch a Predator it's that there really doesn't seem to be a dearth of guys thinking about it.
Joshua Nightshade is offline  
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 02-26-2008, 01:57 PM   #118 (permalink)
Professor of ZOMG
 
Troy Vogel's Avatar
An Internet Telebrity...
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,204
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 3
SL Join Date: August 2004
Well the catch a predator show is just that... a show. They should rename it to "trap a potential pedophile". They do a lot of fancy manipulation in the chat log to REALLLY persuade the people to come out...

They never show you the full chat log of course. I dare them. I dare them to show the full chat log. I bet money 9 out of 10 cases their decoy initiated the exchange and flirted the person into a stupor.

So is that really catching a predator? Or is it turning someone INTO a predator? Thinking it is WAY different than DOING it? Is the party that causes this switch to happen entirely innocent?

If someone gave you the password to the world bank and said, no one will ever see this and know it, you can take all you want, come on, you can be debt free -- wouldnt you be for one moment tempted?
Troy Vogel is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 01:58 PM   #119 (permalink)
Neko-licious™

SLU Supporter
 
Ann Launay's Avatar
Um, er...what now?
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,906
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 8/8/06
Blog Entries: 3

Awards: 1
Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ten View Post
I think furries fall under beastiality.
Humans in costumes, no actual animals involved; ergo, no bestiality.
__________________

Ann Launay is online now  
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 02-26-2008, 01:59 PM   #120 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,567
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troy Vogel View Post
Well the catch a predator show is just that... a show. They should rename it to "trap a potential pedophile". They do a lot of fancy manipulation in the chat log to REALLLY persuade the people to come out...

They never show you the full chat log of course. I dare them. I dare them to show the full chat log. I bet money 9 out of 10 cases their decoy initiated the exchange and flirted the person into a stupor.

So is that really catching a predator? Or is it turning someone INTO a predator? Thinking it is WAY different than DOING it? Is the party that causes this switch to happen entirely innocent?

If someone gave you the password to the world bank and said, no one will ever see this and know it, you can take all you want, come on, you can be debt free -- wouldnt you be for one moment tempted?
Oh no I'm totally with you, it's a completely crap show and total entrapment. But the willingness says to me in part that this probably happens more times than you see.
Joshua Nightshade is offline  
2 Users Said Thanks :
Old 02-26-2008, 02:11 PM   #121 (permalink)
Gone

SLU Supporter
 
Io Zeno's Avatar
Stoking the fires of Hell
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 17,021
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 1

Awards: 1
Most Appropriate  Forum Avatar 
Io Zeno is offline  
1 User Laughed:
Old 02-26-2008, 02:11 PM   #122 (permalink)
Member
 
Zachary Dumart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 44
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade View Post
I'm trying to think of a way to phrase this objectively and I can't seem to.

Instead we have a societal response which is a repression of its own, repression on the heads of anyone who thinks that way that they are depraved and sick and wrong and less than a human. Which gets internalized, layered upon and contributes to the breakdown of their psyche on different levels. The weaker ones break and give up and go target children, who then internalize and repress and feel ashamed to talk about it because as a society we think that all the pedophiles have bags of candy and red letters on their foreheads and never believe it's closer than that.
I think it was Aristotle who said: What a load.

I'll give you that we've all had "thoughts" of doing things that we should never act on. I've had thoughts about murdering people. I've also had thoughts of publicly humiliating people so badly that they lose their jobs and family and end up living on the streets. But, you'll just have to believe me when I say that that the idea of giving the panty poke to a 8 year old just hasn't crossed my mind.

This is some crap that somehow we are all children of god's light and we just need to accept our differences and blah, fucking blah, blah, blah. There's a DIFFERENCE between having thoughts of say, being gay, and sexually abusing a non-consenting child. And my thoughts of killing and humiliation? Damn straight I feel "bad" about them, and if I was serious about them? Then society SHOULD say - "Hey Zach, you're a sociopath!"

Because if we equate this idea that all of our "depraved thoughts" are the same, then you're slipping down that slipperiest of slippery slopes. Next thing you know the right-wing jackholes are saying "SEE!!!! We told you that being gay was the same as being a kid fucker!!!"

You have repeated fantasies about screwing children? And if you feel bad about that? You're not "repressed" - you're a douche and at least you're starting to realize you're a douche.
Zachary Dumart is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 02:13 PM   #123 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,567
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachary Dumart View Post
I think it was Aristotle who said: What a load.

I'll give you that we've all had "thoughts" of doing things that we should never act on. I've had thoughts about murdering people. I've also had thoughts of publicly humiliating people so badly that they lose their jobs and family and end up living on the streets. But, you'll just have to believe me when I say that that the idea of giving the panty poke to a 8 year old just hasn't crossed my mind.

This is some crap that somehow we are all children of god's light and we just need to accept our differences and blah, fucking blah, blah, blah. There's a DIFFERENCE between having thoughts of say, being gay, and sexually abusing a non-consenting child. And my thoughts of killing and humiliation? Damn straight I feel "bad" about them, and if I was serious about them? Then society SHOULD say - "Hey Zach, you're a sociopath!"

Because if we equate this idea that all of our "depraved thoughts" are the same, then your slipping down that slipperiest of slippery slopes. Next thing you know the right-wing jackholes are saying "SEE!!!! We told you that being gay was the same as being a kid fucker!!!"

You have repeated fantasies about screwing children? And if you feel bad about that? You're not "repressed" - you're a douche and at least you're starting to realize you're a douche.
I'll give you a couple minutes to go read the post you quoted and reword your response so it has something to do with what I actually said, instead of what you thought I meant.

Go on, I'll wait.
Joshua Nightshade is offline  
3 Users Laughed:
Old 02-26-2008, 02:18 PM   #124 (permalink)
Gone

SLU Supporter
 
Io Zeno's Avatar
Stoking the fires of Hell
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 17,021
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 1

Awards: 1
Most Appropriate  Forum Avatar 
Josh is different now.







































Io Zeno is offline  
1 User Laughed:
Old 02-26-2008, 02:19 PM   #125 (permalink)
Account Closed
 
Joshua Nightshade's Avatar
Unedited
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 33,567
My Mood:
I am, reflect on how I normally respond to multiple exclamation points.
Joshua Nightshade is offline  
1 User Laughed:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/general-sl-discussion/7382-lalinda-lovell-child-sex-content.html
Posted By For Type Date
Lalinda Lovell Child Sex / Content Thief This thread Refback 03-10-2008 03:32 PM
Autism speaks in Second Life This thread Refback 02-26-2008 08:25 AM