What did the naughty people do ? - Page 2 - SLUniverse Forums
 
Navigation » SLUniverse Forums > Community Discussion > General SL Discussion » What did the naughty people do ?


General SL Discussion Discuss topics related to Second Life

Sponsor:
PDS HomeSecurity Orb
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2009, 11:15 PM   #26 (permalink)
she, not he!

SLU Supporter
 
Jesse Barnett's Avatar
addicted to catnip
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South of DC
Posts: 1,565
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 5/21/2006
If they are going to start cracking down on people wanting to be abused:
Quote:
Community Standards: Harassment, Soliciting Abuse 5
Then who are we going to stock our dungeons with?
__________________
Coffee smells like freshly ground heaven. ~Jessi Lane Adams
Jesse Barnett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2009, 11:16 PM   #27 (permalink)
Junior Member
Lantern by Day
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6
In the early part of the year the G Team asked peacekeeper groups to stop filing multiple ARs for the same incident; up until that time they had asked for ARs to be filed for each type of applicable infringement (so a griefer could easily get 4 to 6 ARs with one replicating spammer cube in the sandboxes). That might contribute to the decline in blotter reports; don't know.
Jack Abraham is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Said Thanks :
Old 09-25-2009, 11:20 PM   #28 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
bladyblue's Avatar
Watching the pandering mob
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 871
My Mood:
SL Join Date: February 2005
Business: CLUB SCHOOL
Send a message via MSN to bladyblue Send a message via Yahoo to bladyblue Send a message via Skype™ to bladyblue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argent Stonecutter View Post
Free accounts started in August or September 2005. Unverified free accounts started in June 2006.
We started having those marketing explosions in the summer of 2007. Yahoo article in France - French Invasion, then Brazil. etc. CSI in October 2007.
__________________



http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bear/214/199/107
Join the open enrollment group CLUB JOBS for free job search.

http://drasticNCIchanges.blogspot.com/
bladyblue is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 09-25-2009, 11:29 PM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tess Whitcroft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,955

Awards: 1
Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Argent Stonecutter View Post
So I gotta stick to sims in the Dallas colo center? o_O
Well, the black-footed ferret is believed to no longer exist in the wild in California, but if one or more were found they would be a protected species.



Tess
__________________
There is a truth that is often overlooked in Second Life,
It is only as great as the effort and heart you put into it.


Tess Whitcroft is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Yay!:
Old 09-26-2009, 02:39 AM   #30 (permalink)
Fortuna vitrea est
 
Tyche Shepherd's Avatar
Warming her pearls
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 5,814
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 26th April 2007

Awards: 1
Best Anglo-Saxon High Horse Reference 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sansarya View Post
Uhm...TWO?
Yes - There were only 2 published copyright infringement violations which resulted in a ban of 14 days (there were 17 in total across the period) . But I'm surprised there are any as now copyright issues are supposed to be resolved through the DMCA process and not the AR process.


Generally I must stress that these figures are only the Published Incident Reports, people say there are plenty of resolved AR's which don't make the Blotter and they certainly don't include any bans which do occur or suspensions for other reasons (account issues, activity which triggers money laundering detection etc) so it's difficult to draw concrete conclusions about the whole AR process from them . The only confidence I have is that these are an accurate analysis of the published incident reports.
__________________

Vanguard of the LolCatz Revolution
This Post was financed by The National LolCatz Archives

Clancy Sullivan :Yeah. YEAH! The sultry seamstress of mirth is definitely in charge now.
Certified 7.8 on the Official Non-Arbitrary Trout Algorithmic Slut scale

A public copy of my Second Life Main Grid Survey Database can be found at http://www.gridsurvey.com - Now with added Second Life Incidents !!


Tyche Shepherd is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 09-26-2009, 05:43 AM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
Confused
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: England
Posts: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyche Shepherd View Post
Yes - There were only 2 published copyright infringement violations which resulted in a ban of 14 days (there were 17 in total across the period) . But I'm surprised there are any as now copyright issues are supposed to be resolved through the DMCA process and not the AR process
DMCA is for a content creator filing, but maybe the copyright issues are for complaints made by people not associated with the product, for example where RL brand names are used and there's no evidence of the person having the right to use that brand name. I know there has been talk of such listings being removed from Xstreet.
Ciaran Laval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2009, 07:28 AM   #32 (permalink)
Horns holding my halo?
Angelic
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
My Mood:
If this contains both teen and adult grid - did both areas have a drop in incidents at same time? or was it skewed toward one or the other?

Thanks for posting these!
Talon DeCuir is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 09-26-2009, 08:14 AM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
Multi-planet virtual citzen
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 458
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJ Tunwarm View Post
Amazing work.

It sort of looks like '07 was a peak year of being naughty. I wonder what was up?
I think that was the peak of new account creation.
DanielRavenNest is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 09-26-2009, 04:03 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Lalo Telling's Avatar
Feline Inner Core
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 204
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 12/5/07
Business: Telling Images
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hypatia Callisto View Post
Furries have the best dramaz.
Quote:
Lusk 45
FurNation Vista 35
Rizal 20
Outside of the help areas and the sandboxes, I'd say, "Yup, we do."

FurNaton Vista is the home of The Ark, a major furry hangout - I've been there when while it was being griefed by the PN.

Lusk is, of course the home of Luskwood, the oldest continuous furry gathering place in SL (about to celebrate its 6th birthday).

Rizal is the nearest sandbox to Lusk - it is, in fact the sim immediately adjacent to the south and is, I suspect, the creation and launching point for much of the "replicator cube" type of attack.

I know this because I am a Luskwood Resident. My home is a parcel of Group land in Tehama, immediately east of Rizal and southeast of Lusk. We get our share of replicators and scripted spam attacks, too.
__________________
Telling: Like it Is
Lalo Telling is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Said Thanks :
Old 10-01-2009, 08:02 AM   #35 (permalink)
CEO, BNT Holdings, ACE
 
IntLibber Brautigan's Avatar
Tradin' lulzy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 70
SL Join Date: September 29, 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyche Shepherd View Post
that may be some cases, but from the descriptions it also seems to cover Missing registration details as well, though the most common description seems just to be "Terms of Service" . I believe it's a general push to ensure that peoples registration details are real , but I could be wrong
It's one of those sort of *being black on a sunny day* type violations that certain Lindens abuse to kick out people they dont like the looks of without any evidence that they're actually doing anything wrong. The assumption is that if they are innocent, they wont have any trouble getting identity confirmed, and if they do provide ID and they decide they don't like that person in real life they say, thanks, don't come back again, often with loss of significant sums of money and/or land resulting.
IntLibber Brautigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 08:13 AM   #36 (permalink)
CEO, BNT Holdings, ACE
 
IntLibber Brautigan's Avatar
Tradin' lulzy
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 70
SL Join Date: September 29, 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Abraham View Post
In the early part of the year the G Team asked peacekeeper groups to stop filing multiple ARs for the same incident; up until that time they had asked for ARs to be filed for each type of applicable infringement (so a griefer could easily get 4 to 6 ARs with one replicating spammer cube in the sandboxes). That might contribute to the decline in blotter reports; don't know.
What they actually want people to do is file an AR for each type of offense relating to the same act. So a self replicating spammer cube that emits goatse needs an AR for each of the following: a) abusing sim resources, b) prim pollution, c) spamming, d) broadly offensive content, and possibly e) harassment if it happens multiple times. Otherwise you could file an AR on just one charge and the investigator would give it a pass on the one charge and not punish for the others, making it a crapshoot whether the perp gets punished. Obviously you should be able to select multiple offenses on one AR but thats not allowed in the client.

On another note, I think the stats published here prove what I've long been saying: our efforts in changing the approach to griefers, of abandoning the "war on e-terror" approach that all the faux-cop groups play at which turn griefing into a video game for users, and instead adopting a juvie crime model and dealing with it with creative outlets and economic opportunities, using the Woodbury University virtual campus as the centerpiece, have led to a long term downward trend in griefing, as we first drained the manpower of organised griefing groups and gave a place for socially maladjusted /b/tards to sandbox and hang out with their own kind without being judged by opinionated politically correct vigilantes with a finger on the ban button.

A simple "thank you" will suffice.
IntLibber Brautigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 10:17 AM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Lalo Telling's Avatar
Feline Inner Core
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 204
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 12/5/07
Business: Telling Images
Quote:
Originally Posted by IntLibber Brautigan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Abraham
In the early part of the year the G Team asked peacekeeper groups to stop filing multiple ARs for the same incident; up until that time they had asked for ARs to be filed for each type of applicable infringement (so a griefer could easily get 4 to 6 ARs with one replicating spammer cube in the sandboxes).
What they actually want people to do is file an AR for each type of offense relating to the same act. So a self replicating spammer cube that emits goatse needs an AR for each of the following: a) abusing sim resources, b) prim pollution, c) spamming, d) broadly offensive content, and possibly e) harassment if it happens multiple times.
Can you point me to unequivocal guidelines in the so-called "knowledge base" that give clear indications about what LL "wants" regarding griefing ARs -- and which classification of offense should be used to file each type?

I didn't think so.

Incidentally (pun on "incident" intended), yesterday afternoon (9/30) another sequence of replicator cubes, launched from Rizal, appeared over Lusk and Tehama simultaneously. I filed an AR for each of two cubes in Tehama, and reported such in IM to one of the Luskwood core group in-world at the time. He told me about the "cautionary" Jack mentioned (see quote), and implied that I could be suspended for filing too many ARs!

Quote:
Originally Posted by IntLibber Brautigan View Post
Otherwise you could file an AR on just one charge and the investigator would give it a pass on the one charge and not punish for the others, making it a crapshoot whether the perp gets punished. Obviously you should be able to select multiple offenses on one AR but thats not allowed in the client.
It's a crap shoot anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by IntLibber Brautigan View Post
On another note, I think the stats published here prove what I've long been saying: our efforts in changing the approach to griefers, of abandoning the "war on e-terror" approach that all the faux-cop groups play at which turn griefing into a video game for users, and instead adopting a juvie crime model and dealing with it with creative outlets and economic opportunities, using the Woodbury University virtual campus as the centerpiece, have led to a long term downward trend in griefing, as we first drained the manpower of organised griefing groups and gave a place for socially maladjusted /b/tards to sandbox and hang out with their own kind without being judged by opinionated politically correct vigilantes with a finger on the ban button.

A simple "thank you" will suffice.
"Our efforts" -- Whose? What efforts?

"...drained the manpower of organised griefing groups" -- Got numbers to back that up? How effective have "your" efforts been in reducing the impact of, for example, the PN?

When I see something deserving of a "thank you", I'll think about expressing one. Smug superiority, meanwhile, doesn't cut it. When the attacks contain material specifically targeted at your SL-equivalent of an ethnic group (pompous self-important land barons, perhaps?), let's see if you're still whining about "politically correct" and "faux-cop" groups.

In my experience, people who complain about "political correctness" are actually complaining that they can no longer get away with their own bigotry.
Lalo Telling is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 10-01-2009, 02:37 PM   #38 (permalink)
m9(^Д^)
 
Kyllie Wylie's Avatar
All for Me!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: カナダバンクーバー
Posts: 6,765
My Mood:
SL Join Date: March 2008
Business: Rock'n Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by bladyblue View Post
We started having those marketing explosions in the summer of 2007. Yahoo article in France - French Invasion, then Brazil. etc. CSI in October 2007.
Also wasnt 2007 was when all the "language" viewers came out?

Which opened up SL to a lot of people who could not speak english, which also can lead to misunderstandings when dealing with people who dont speak your language and probably more complaints.
__________________


Quote:
I am giving you a 6.2 on the Official, Semi-scientific Troutonometer Slut Rating Scale. Congratulations, you are not a slut, but you are close to the perfect combination of personality, beauty and sexiness.
Kyllie Wylie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 05:12 AM   #39 (permalink)
Yuo
Yuo
 
Yuo's Avatar
Yuo
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 76
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by IntLibber Brautigan View Post
It's one of those sort of *being black on a sunny day* type violations that certain Lindens abuse to kick out people they dont like the looks of without any evidence that they're actually doing anything wrong. The assumption is that if they are innocent, they wont have any trouble getting identity confirmed, and if they do provide ID and they decide they don't like that person in real life they say, thanks, don't come back again, often with loss of significant sums of money and/or land resulting.

Fun answer but another version is that some of the original 3rd party orientation islands didnt impliment a full suite of identity fields therefore if a linden goes through the records there will be members with that data missing.

When ones found (and im sure this is something they put the office noobie on for a day once a month) they send a warning email along with setting the edit bit on your account so when you next log in you can fill in the required fields that usually arent show and if you do that, everythings fine from there.
Yuo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 07:11 AM   #40 (permalink)
Eclectic Randomness
 
Winter Ventura's Avatar
Predictable Experience
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pod Six
Posts: 1,444
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 5
SL Join Date: 7/13/2006
What these numbers don't show.. is the number of reports received. What we're seeing may not be a reduction in the number of abuses, nor in the number of reported abuses.. but a reduction in the number of reports being either processed or acted upon.... or perhaps a reduction in the number of acted upon reports being shown in the blotter.
__________________

Inworld Store: http://slurl.eclectic-randomness.com
Website: http://www.eclectic-randomness.com
Twitter: WinterVentura
Winter Ventura is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
data explosion, incident report, tycharrific, tyche didn't do this

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On