Well, I don't think the lab is gonna budge on the price hike. - Page 2 - SLUniverse Forums
 
Navigation » SLUniverse Forums > Community Discussion > General SL Discussion » Well, I don't think the lab is gonna budge on the price hike.


General SL Discussion Discuss topics related to Second Life

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-31-2008, 10:41 AM   #26 (permalink)
Member
Status needs editing.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beebo Brink View Post
Sorry, but that's a big FAIL for you.


They do not advise different use and they do not support performance issues that arise from different use. That is a CYA statement and NOT a prohibition.
If after reading that, you think that LL was perfect OK with people renting out OS land for people to live on, well, that's just daft.

--Hugsy
Hugsy Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 10:43 AM   #27 (permalink)
Coco's Cottages
 
Cocoanut Koala's Avatar
There is no sanctuary. You may think there is, but there isn't.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 8,384
SLShopper Ads: 8
Business: Coco's Cottages

Awards: 1
Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
I live on an OS by choice. I share it with 2 friends who never log in. I built nothing there but a house and a skybox so I had a place to hang out, change clothes, and maybe chat with a guest now and then. It's been a dream of mine for 3 years to have a quiet beachfront all my own where I could find peace and solitude from the ad farms, griefers, and chat spam of the mainland.

But now, because LL never enforced any scripting limits and act all shocked that someone would actually try to use these things like a real sim, I doubt I'll be able to afford it any more. This is the last thing that's kept me around SL (other than some friends). I don't need to pay tier to drop in and visit friends, but it breaks my heart to think I might have to give up my beach.
It's okay, it's okay, it's okay. To give up your beach, if you have to.

It broke my heart to give up my beach on Azure Islands, which is not an open sim, but is owned by Adam (and I presume, still, Nexus) who own a HUMONGOUS AMOUNT of open sims. Or more accurately, I thought it would break my heart. Once it was gone and I no longer had to pay that extra tier, all of a sudden it wasn't breaking my heart at all. My heart was relieved.

(I had to give it up because it was stupid to pay them for tier when I was already paying LL for more tier than I was using, once I upped my shop land.)

And now I'm wondering what are Nexus and Adam going to do, since they own all those open sims. (And, I think, basically pioneered them, hand-in-hand with LL.) Since their open sims ARE mostly all nothing but trees, I wonder, too, if the increase will apply to them.

From this experience (heart-breaking that wasn't really), I now realize that it won't break my heart that much no matter what LL forces me to give up in the future. Which I imagine they will.

Because it turns out most of the "heart-breaking" and grieving part seems to come BEFORE, not after, you accept your losses and giveup. It turns out to be lots easier to take one's losses and turn one's back on things than I thought it would be.

coco
__________________
~ Coco's Cottages ~
Rosieri 87,165,88

Newest Addition:


SNOWY WOODS COTTAGE

~from the 512 Collection~
Cocoanut Koala is offline   Reply With Quote
3 Users Said Thanks :
Old 10-31-2008, 10:46 AM   #28 (permalink)
Uppity Alt

SLU Supporter
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,869
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 19
SL Join Date: October 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
If after reading that, you think that LL was perfect OK with people renting out OS land for people to live on, well, that's just daft.
And if you think LL wasn't providing a deliberate nudge-nudge-wink-wink you are naive.

If LL truly didn't want to increase the appeal of OSS to pump up sales, the wording would have been explicit.

"Open Space sims should not be used for residential living."

Instead they chose a wording that said, "You can do what you want, but we won't bail you out if you do."

And people took them at their word.
__________________
Beebo Brink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 10:46 AM   #29 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Quantum Destiny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: England
Posts: 2,149
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: 25 July 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
I understand the backlash against LL. However, the policy on OSs is:
"It is therefore important to understand what these regions are. They are provided for light use only, not for building, living in, renting as homes or use for events. As a stretch of open water for boating or a scenic wooded area they are fine, but we do not advise more serious use than this and will not respond to performance issues reported should you not use them in this way."
"Light use" may be somewhat vague, but the policy explicitly forbids renting and living in. LL may have changed some policies about OSs, used them themselves that go against this policy, and even let people go with them for too far, but they never changed this description. Some people were using them for obviously more than what was intended, yet very few seem upset about that.

--Hugsy

But Linden Lab continued selling them in the hundreds - fully aware of how they were being used. If the OS sim use was being 'abused', they should have either come down on the 'abusers', or offered a higher tier level for anything more than 'light' use, ages ago. I mean how long has this been going on? It must be near enough two years now? I can't recall, but it's certainly more than a few months.
Quantum Destiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 10:50 AM   #30 (permalink)
Invisibly Delicious
 
MoxZ Mokeev's Avatar
Wewtie! I has Two Ghosties
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arkansas USA
Posts: 812
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 8/25/07
Blog Entries: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerboa Haystack View Post

I had just started looking around for a little land when the news hit. Now, I'm hesitant to even look at estate rentals, because the playing field is changing so much between now and January.
If you plan to stay in SL, don't let this scare you away from renting on estates. Just do your homework. Go with someone trustworthy like Sarah Nerd or Cove Islands. There are a LOT of good land owners out there still who will let you know if you're renting an OS or a regular estate sim. I personally prefer the estate because for me they're less laggy, they're better teraformed and you're less likely to have someone build something fugly next to you. There are many pros and cons for both estate and mainland.
__________________


Wipe your mouth, there's still a tiny bit of bullshit around your lips.
MoxZ Mokeev is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Agreed:
Old 10-31-2008, 10:50 AM   #31 (permalink)
Cheap but never free
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
"-ish"
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,554
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
When Openspaces came out, Linden Lab made it clear they were for light use only. Plus they gave examples of what *not* to do with them. Two examples are: not to be rented out and not to be lived in. Through-out the changes they made to Openspaces, they never changed this description. I agree that the changes they made and LL's own actual usage of OSs did make it seem like you were allowed to do more, but there was *no* official policy change.
Rule #1 for Virtual World Developers: If you offer the users/residents/players a desireable feature, they will exploit it beyond any limitations you have imagined.

Corollary 1: Verbal or written limitations are insufficient. Physical or programmatic limitations are the only practical way to enforce limits.

In other words, whatever you imagined your residents not doing, they will find a way to do unless you program it otherwise.

I have a hard time believing that they couldn't have set up these void sims with hard limits on script processing and texture load so that the resident got a warning when they were within 20% (for example) of the limit, and the OS shut down if the limit was exceeded.

It would have saved a lot of grief for those of us who aren't loading the OS's but now have to be punished along with the businesses and apartment complexes someone threw up on a void sim.
__________________
Sometimes, "I hit it with my axe" is the best solution.
Cindy Claveau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 10:51 AM   #32 (permalink)
Uppity Alt

SLU Supporter
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,869
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 19
SL Join Date: October 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoanut Koala View Post
Once it was gone and I no longer had to pay that extra tier, all of a sudden it wasn't breaking my heart at all. My heart was relieved.
Interesting, that's exactly how it turned out for me when I gave up my mainland parcel (well, most of it, rented out the rest).

I'd been paying tier on the property for over a year, and this last spring I found myself bending over backward to keep it even though it was a poor fit for my store and I'd actually been living elsewhere for months.

Giving it up was very hard, but just like you describe, aftewards it didn't hurt nearly as much as I had expected. When I look back on all the different properties I've held, and enjoyed, I can safely say that moving forward was always for the best.
Beebo Brink is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Said Thanks :
Old 10-31-2008, 10:52 AM   #33 (permalink)
Coco's Cottages
 
Cocoanut Koala's Avatar
There is no sanctuary. You may think there is, but there isn't.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 8,384
SLShopper Ads: 8
Business: Coco's Cottages

Awards: 1
Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
I understand the backlash against LL. However, the policy on OSs is:
"It is therefore important to understand what these regions are. They are provided for light use only, not for building, living in, renting as homes or use for events. As a stretch of open water for boating or a scenic wooded area they are fine, but we do not advise more serious use than this and will not respond to performance issues reported should you not use them in this way."
"Light use" may be somewhat vague, but the policy explicitly forbids renting and living in. LL may have changed some policies about OSs, used them themselves that go against this policy, and even let people go with them for too far, but they never changed this description. Some people were using them for obviously more than what was intended, yet very few seem upset about that.

--Hugsy

Did it always say that?

coco
Cocoanut Koala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 10:56 AM   #34 (permalink)
Member
Status needs editing.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoanut Koala View Post
Did it always say that?

coco
I believe so:

Information about Openspaces (void regions) « Official Second Life Blog

--Hugsy
Hugsy Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 10:58 AM   #35 (permalink)
Uppity Alt

SLU Supporter
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,869
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 19
SL Join Date: October 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoanut Koala View Post
Did it always say that?
To the best of my recollection, that was the description that stood from the time that OSS were more restricted and more difficult to purchase. LL announced, with great fanfare, all the ways in which OSS were being upgraded and the old CYA in the Knowledge Base didn't change.

But if we went by what is in the KB, people would still be trying to get 3 residents together to form a group. LL has never maintained the KB sufficiently for any seasoned resident to consider it to be a reliable source.
Beebo Brink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:03 AM   #36 (permalink)
Member
Status needs editing.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beebo Brink View Post
And if you think LL wasn't providing a deliberate nudge-nudge-wink-wink you are naive.

If LL truly didn't want to increase the appeal of OSS to pump up sales, the wording would have been explicit.

"Open Space sims should not be used for residential living."

Instead they chose a wording that said, "You can do what you want, but we won't bail you out if you do."

And people took them at their word.
So ok, people were using OSs for things they shoud not be used for, LL lays the smack down, and noone's upset with those who misused them. Personally, I'm not surprised LL is putting a stop to the misuse, but kinda surprised it's so harsh.

--Hugsy
Hugsy Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:04 AM   #37 (permalink)
BUY TREES MOAR1
 
Khamon's Avatar
Iz a timeout
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,819
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: November, 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
Rule #1 for Virtual World Developers: If you offer the users/residents/players a desireable feature, they will exploit it beyond any limitations you have imagined.

Corollary 1: Verbal or written limitations are insufficient. Physical or programmatic limitations are the only practical way to enforce limits.
These don't apply exclusively to virtual worlds but are fundamental tenets of Computer Science Systems Analysis courses and the Management Information Systems classes all Business majors take.
__________________
But of bliss and glad life there is little to be said, before it ends; as works fair and wonderful, while still they endure for eyes to see, are their own record, and only when they are in peril or broken for ever do they pass into song. - Quenta Silmarillion

Please Visit Our Gardens and Our Website
Khamon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:04 AM   #38 (permalink)
Member
Status needs editing.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
Rule #1 for Virtual World Developers: If you offer the users/residents/players a desireable feature, they will exploit it beyond any limitations you have imagined.

Corollary 1: Verbal or written limitations are insufficient. Physical or programmatic limitations are the only practical way to enforce limits.

In other words, whatever you imagined your residents not doing, they will find a way to do unless you program it otherwise.

I have a hard time believing that they couldn't have set up these void sims with hard limits on script processing and texture load so that the resident got a warning when they were within 20% (for example) of the limit, and the OS shut down if the limit was exceeded.

It would have saved a lot of grief for those of us who aren't loading the OS's but now have to be punished along with the businesses and apartment complexes someone threw up on a void sim.
I totally agree with all of the above.

--Hugsy
Hugsy Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:04 AM   #39 (permalink)
Hell is other people
 
caroline ra's Avatar
MYOB
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zummerzet
Posts: 2,270
SL Join Date: Dec 2006
Send a message via Yahoo to caroline ra Send a message via Skype™ to caroline ra
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
I understand the backlash against LL. However, the policy on OSs is:
"It is therefore important to understand what these regions are. They are provided for light use only, not for building, living in, renting as homes or use for events. As a stretch of open water for boating or a scenic wooded area they are fine, but we do not advise more serious use than this and will not respond to performance issues reported should you not use them in this way."
"Light use" may be somewhat vague, but the policy explicitly forbids renting and living in. LL may have changed some policies about OSs, used them themselves that go against this policy, and even let people go with them for too far, but they never changed this description. Some people were using them for obviously more than what was intended, yet very few seem upset about that.

--Hugsy


This is what puddles my limited understanding of this issue.....
IF they were just meant for parks and sailing water why did LL need to increase prims to 3750? You cant sail anything with more than about 30 prims I think the script wont wear it.

Again if it was just meant to sail in or as a park, why did they make them stand-alone.
And a parkland of trees in the middle of nowhere that you can just sit and look at, whats the point of that?

The thing that also makes me laugh is when people say...LL dont know what theyre doing...
Well ya know what, I think LL know EXACTLY what theyre doing when it comes to raking in money because every policy change theyve made has ended up fucking the residents in the arse and LL has benefited each time. So no, I think when it comes to squeezing every last $ out of ppls love for SL that they know exactly what theyre doing.

Im standing by my original decision to shut down each of my OS's when they become vacant and Im not even interested in joining them into another full prim sim or selling them on (even if anyone wanted them)...cause you know what, in another 6 months theyll do something else to arse fuck land renters and Im having trouble sitting comfortably as it is.
caroline ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:08 AM   #40 (permalink)
Cheap but never free
 
Cindy Claveau's Avatar
"-ish"
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,554
My Mood:
SL Join Date: May, 2005

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khamon View Post
These don't apply exclusively to virtual worlds but are fundamental tenets of Computer Science Systems Analysis courses and the Management Information Systems classes all Business majors take.
That's where I got it (well, that and years playing MMOs).

Which makes me wonder if anyone at LL has been exposed to any such course?

Cindy Claveau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:09 AM   #41 (permalink)
BUY TREES MOAR1
 
Khamon's Avatar
Iz a timeout
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 4,819
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: November, 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cocoanut Koala View Post
And now I'm wondering what are Nexus and Adam going to do, since they own all those open sims. (And, I think, basically pioneered them, hand-in-hand with LL.) Since their open sims ARE mostly all nothing but trees, I wonder, too, if the increase will apply to them.
This particularly affects Azure because they pioneered by incorporating openspaces in the middle of their landmasses as empty, explorable mountain ranges and such. To close them now would mean realigning their entire continental structure.

But I'm sure LL is convinced that they'll just pay the extra monthly fees. It is Second Life after all; what else are they gonna do with their time and money?

Besides, their going to be enjoying an optimal experience beginning in January. That's gotta be worth a several hundred a month.
Khamon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:10 AM   #42 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Quantum Destiny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: England
Posts: 2,149
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: 25 July 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by caroline ra View Post


This is what puddles my limited understanding of this issue.....
IF they were just meant for parks and sailing water why did LL need to increase prims to 3750? You cant sail anything with more than about 30 prims I think the script wont wear it.
That seems to me to be one of the biggest holes in LL's position.
Quantum Destiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:19 AM   #43 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Brenda Connolly's Avatar
I am THAT crazy
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,257
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: Jan 9,2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beebo Brink View Post
Interesting, that's exactly how it turned out for me when I gave up my mainland parcel (well, most of it, rented out the rest).

I'd been paying tier on the property for over a year, and this last spring I found myself bending over backward to keep it even though it was a poor fit for my store and I'd actually been living elsewhere for months.

Giving it up was very hard, but just like you describe, aftewards it didn't hurt nearly as much as I had expected. When I look back on all the different properties I've held, and enjoyed, I can safely say that moving forward was always for the best.

When I quit SL in April, it was a Cold Turkey, on fell swoop move. I didn't want to bother trying to sell my 4096 island space, I didn't even bother logging in to collect my stuff or formally abandon it. I just cancelled my account from the website, and let the landlort just take it back. Not having that monthly charge anymore felt great, as some months I was only going there just to pay my tier.
Brenda Connolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:20 AM   #44 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Quantum Destiny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: England
Posts: 2,149
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 2
SL Join Date: 25 July 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
So ok, people were using OSs for things they shoud not be used for, LL lays the smack down, and noone's upset with those who misused them. Personally, I'm not surprised LL is putting a stop to the misuse after having sold thousands of sims that they knew they would never have sold if they had enforced lighter use earlier, but kinda surprised it's so harsh.

--Hugsy

/fixed

Quantum Destiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:20 AM   #45 (permalink)
LoD Mgr and Joolry Maker
 
Rosie Barthelmess's Avatar
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central US
Posts: 1,632
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 9
SL Join Date: May 6, 2007
Business: Sable Rose Jewelry/Lounge Of Dreams
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
So ok, people were using OSs for things they shoud not be used for, LL lays the smack down, and noone's upset with those who misused them. Personally, I'm not surprised LL is putting a stop to the misuse, but kinda surprised it's so harsh.

--Hugsy
LL offered conversion to people who were renting their full sims for residential use, at the rate of four open space sims to one full sim.

If you think that LL truly believed virtual landlords were going to trade in their residential, income-generating sims for four chunks of open water scattered in the middle of the Linden ocean, you're daft.
__________________


Owner/Designer, Sable Rose Jewelry
Gallinas (near The Shelter): http://slurl.com/secondlife/Gallinas/198/11/59
Filataponic @ Subtle Submission: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Filataponic/209/198/50

Manager & House DJ, Lounge of Dreams

http://skatoolaki.com/sablerose -- Sable Rose Jewelry's blog.
http://rosiebarthelmess.com-- my blog.

Trout Rated: 7.0
"You are evidence that a woman who is comfortable in her own skin has a definite advantage over those who are not."
Rosie Barthelmess is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Said Thanks :
Old 10-31-2008, 11:24 AM   #46 (permalink)
Senior Member

SLU Supporter
 
Humps's Avatar
I refuse to edit my status
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,347
My Mood:
SL Join Date: 19th May 2006
Business: Fab Pads!

Awards: 1
Best Squirrel Anecdote 
Send a message via Yahoo to Humps Send a message via Skype™ to Humps
You know what the sad part about all this is? If six months ago LL had actually put some thought into this and offered OSS's even on the tier they are suggesting now, and promoted them as a mini sim, better than an standard OS, not as good as a full sim but a decent value for money product that sat in-between, they would have still sold faster than LL could process them.

There would be no uproar now either because people would have known what they were buying into and would not feel like LL deceived them or missold them anything. The lab would not be trying to avoid a PR and customer relations disaster and customers would not be disillusioned and seriously looking for alternatives. All for the want of a little thought in the first place. It was all so appallingly simple and yet true to form LL jumped in and made what could have been a positive and progressive move into a shambolic mess.

Whatever people end up with now they will consider they have been duped by LL. It will never be what they feel they were originally sold or promised. What they would have been happy to buy like ice cream on a hot day will now only ever be something they were tricked into buying, if of course they even bother to retain what they have.
__________________


Humps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:25 AM   #47 (permalink)
Member
Status needs editing.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beebo Brink View Post
To the best of my recollection, that was the description that stood from the time that OSS were more restricted and more difficult to purchase. LL announced, with great fanfare, all the ways in which OSS were being upgraded and the old CYA in the Knowledge Base didn't change.

But if we went by what is in the KB, people would still be trying to get 3 residents together to form a group. LL has never maintained the KB sufficiently for any seasoned resident to consider it to be a reliable source.
The knowledge base articles have a last modified date so you can see how old the information is. If there were any questions on whether or not particular parts of the article were still relevant, LL should have been contacted directly.

--Hugsy
Hugsy Penguin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2008, 11:29 AM   #48 (permalink)
LoD Mgr and Joolry Maker
 
Rosie Barthelmess's Avatar
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central US
Posts: 1,632
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 9
SL Join Date: May 6, 2007
Business: Sable Rose Jewelry/Lounge Of Dreams
A few of us who have openspaces through the same resident, used as individual residences, are waiting to see what they're going to do as far as concessions for trading up or giving credit on setup fees towards something else. None of us can afford to keep our OS's at the tier we have now without setting up some kind of business on them in order to try to help them make the tier, which is 100% against the reason why we bought them anyway. Sigh.

So now we're trying to see if they'll be doing anything for up-conversion for people with fewer than four OS's, since the resident who technically is the owner of ours has three, and we might cover the rest of the gap and move into a full sim with the four of us each taking a corner of it for 3750 prims and $75/mo. At least then we still know who our neighbors are and that the landscape won't be destroyed, plus it'll be similar primage.

But I do not for a moment expect them to budge on $125 being the minimum for anything other than an open water sim. I can see them maybe giving in to a concession for the sailing community or something else, but I reckon they will say ANYTHING with any kind of build on it will start at $125 which both on principle and practicality is not possible for me.
Rosie Barthelmess is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 10-31-2008, 11:30 AM   #49 (permalink)
Sim crossing test dummy
 
BJ Tunwarm's Avatar
I am the nice one
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 143
My Mood:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoxZ Mokeev View Post
You know...here's what pisses me off. I LIVE on an OS. I didn't mean to live on an OS, it was my landlord who promoted the living on OS. She has no less than 8 renters living on OS. I had no clue about what an OS was or the limitations of them. So I guess according to LL she's one of the bad guys. Now because of the price hike, I'm going to have to pack up and find another place to live. Fuck if I'm paying more to live on a light version sim.

You are being ripped off and your landloard is one of the douchebags. Most other OS are at most 4 renters. Full sim 16 lots, OS 4 lots. Go look for land on a full sim since you aren't bothered by having neighbors.
__________________
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Whole sims on fire off with griefer particle spam off the shoulder of Nautilus . I watched bling glitter in the shadows of Kristen Viewer. All these moments will be lost in time, like posts on an IM chat... Time to log off.“ Botrunner.
BJ Tunwarm is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Agreed:
Old 10-31-2008, 11:30 AM   #50 (permalink)
LoD Mgr and Joolry Maker
 
Rosie Barthelmess's Avatar
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central US
Posts: 1,632
My Mood:
SLShopper Ads: 9
SL Join Date: May 6, 2007
Business: Sable Rose Jewelry/Lounge Of Dreams
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugsy Penguin View Post
The knowledge base articles have a last modified date so you can see how old the information is. If there were any questions on whether or not particular parts of the article were still relevant, LL should have been contacted directly.

--Hugsy
It's pretty obvious to me that you aren't caught up to date on the spin that's coming from LL now about the openspaces and their use, as they are now not claiming that they were abused but that they were used in new, exciting and creative ways and that we are getting more value out of them than the pricepoint, so they are trying to close that gap.

I understand this is a pretty easy button to poke with a stick since so many of us are going to be affected, but you may want to catch up on the current party line coming out of LL rather than depending on an outdated knowledgebase article from February or March for your facts and figures.
Rosie Barthelmess is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Said Thanks :
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On