Landbot steals still happening =( - Page 3 - SLUniverse Forums
sluniverse logo SLUNIVERSE


Go Back   SLUniverse Forums > Community Discussion > General SL Discussion

General SL Discussion Discuss topics related to Second Life

Reply
Old 08-07-2008, 06:05 PM   #51 (permalink)
I BUY LAND
 
Sarah Nerd's Avatar
Can I play with your land?
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shermerville
Posts: 7,046
SLShopper Ads: 1

My Mood:

Awards: 2
Special Achievement in Thread Titling Thread Title of the Week 

Although originally I had big issues with bots in general, I've gotten used to them and now I even use one to do group invites for my freebie group and I use the bot from landmachine.com to manage/price/track/set up trees and displays for me. My issue is with the people that misuse them like this piece of shit stealing with them or people who put 20 up on a lot to increase traffic.
Sarah Nerd is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
3 Users Agreed:
Old 08-07-2008, 06:08 PM   #52 (permalink)
Wodenborn
 
Daman's Avatar
Sovereign
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,368
SL Join Date: May 2007

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gigs View Post
Wow, I expected better from you. Do you also think we should get rid of all LSL scripting?

Maybe we should ban machines from factories, because they take jobs away from artisans?
Scripting has tons of uses, most of them legit.

And I guess I exaggerated in my post. It's just that every single time I hear bots mentioned it's negatively. It's hard to see really legit means.
__________________
Daman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 06:41 PM   #53 (permalink)
Konichiwa, Bitches
 
Brenda Connolly's Avatar
I'll Be Back
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nu Jerzee, USSA
Posts: 4,392
SL Join Date: January 2007

The Bot Runner in question is a shit, no way around that. I won't go into whether bots are good or bad, I'm ambivalent mostly, they can be misused just like anything else.

The land sale interface is straightforward enough for me, I read all the boxes before clicking yes, and understand that selling to ANYBODY means just that. I don't know how many additional clickthroughs you can add, some people just won't read them all no matter how much hand holding or nanny stating we do. I don't think the various time delaying tactic are a good idea, they may just make the process bog down.

I will grant that those who don't speak English as a primary language may have difficulty. And that speaks to LL's shameful habit of not making essential knowledge to survive in SL readily available and up to date. They won't get involved and that is fine. Then they have a duty to see that we can access what we need to know when needed. They don't have to spoon feed us, but it should be in an accessible place. Land dealing being the biggest part of the economy dictates that there should be a comprehensive guide on an official LL space, not buried in some wiki or 3rd party site
Brenda Connolly is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Users Agreed:
Old 08-07-2008, 07:22 PM   #54 (permalink)
Banned
Meerkatting
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,747

Awards: 1
Thread Title of the Week 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daman View Post
Scripting has tons of uses, most of them legit.

And I guess I exaggerated in my post. It's just that every single time I hear bots mentioned it's negatively. It's hard to see really legit means.
There are probably more people running legit bots than there are people running scammy land bots. It's just airplane syndrome, you only hear about them when they crash, not the millions of uneventful flights.
Gigs is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 08-07-2008, 07:25 PM   #55 (permalink)
Wodenborn
 
Daman's Avatar
Sovereign
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,368
SL Join Date: May 2007

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gigs View Post
There are probably more people running legit bots than there are people running scammy land bots. It's just airplane syndrome, you only hear about them when they crash, not the millions of uneventful flights.
Yeah. You're right.

I just looked a bit into bots tonight. And apparently there are bots that do useful things. For example what Sarah described.

So you can consider my comment regarding all bots as retracted. I misjudged with that.
Daman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 07:53 PM   #56 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Colette Meiji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,221

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gigs View Post
There are probably more people running legit bots than there are people running scammy land bots. It's just airplane syndrome, you only hear about them when they crash, not the millions of uneventful flights.
I don't know ..

Airplanes are not designed to crash.

Land Bots *are* designed to get land as cheap as possible as fast as possible.
Colette Meiji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 08:08 PM   #57 (permalink)
exp(ln(Gearhead))
 
Aodhan McDunnough's Avatar
ti gnivol dna ykeeG
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,615
SL Join Date: March 28, 2006
Business: Aodhan's Forge
SLShopper Ads: 2

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJQuad View Post
And not dealing with mainland. With Private Islands at least there are Estate Managers who care enough to do something about this and other things that LL won't do if it's mainland.
True for the good estate managers.

Unfortunately we have another set of horror stories regarding estate managers. Those would be estate managers who evict their tenants in violation of their original agreements. Also is the case of sim transfers and the new owner will not honor the previous rental agreements. The sum involved in a single contract breach can reach hundreds to thousands of US$.

The main problem with renting on private estate is the absence of a binding rental contract. All you have going for you is a trust contract. Whereas LL's land use rules for the mainland are fixed and published and you can only lose your rights if you're in serious violation of the TOS and CS.

Both land types have their problems and their benefits. I'm on the mainland because bots I can deal with but arbitrary and unscrupulous estate managers I cannot.

Re: Captcha
It's been proposed before and I do like it, but I think someone said captcha can be defeated. It still might help on a limited basis.

Re: Bots in general
Bots aren't the problem. It's the user.
__________________

We can't get rid of Landbots but we can stop the damage.
VOTE this proposal on the Jira.
Current votes: 71

http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-2905

Kontours Classic 1-prim chair. Sculpted, menu controlled
http://www.sluniverse.com/php/shop/s...ct=786&cat=500

Last edited by Aodhan McDunnough; 08-07-2008 at 08:14 PM.
Aodhan McDunnough is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 08:29 PM   #58 (permalink)
exp(ln(Gearhead))
 
Aodhan McDunnough's Avatar
ti gnivol dna ykeeG
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,615
SL Join Date: March 28, 2006
Business: Aodhan's Forge
SLShopper Ads: 2

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyche Shepherd View Post
There is a JIRA for a confirmation of sale option similar to this https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-2905 - The difference is that seller confirmation is required in the first 5 or 10 minutes of a lot being on sale - after that it reverts to no seller confirmation required
Yep guys, 2905's my Jira posting regarding this matter. The features were a collaboration of about 8(?) of us here.
Aodhan McDunnough is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2008, 10:23 PM   #59 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tess Whitcroft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 601

How about if you built in a restriction that you couldn't sell land below a certain price without selling it TO a specific avatar? The sell process just wouldn't activate for a sale below, for example, L$1 per sq meter (those of you who regularly buy and sell land I am sure could suggest a better price than my wild guess) unless a specific sell to avatar name was entered. No one would ever enter the name of any landbot in any transaction like that so that usefulness of predatory landbots would be pretty much zero.

Tess
Tess Whitcroft is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 08-08-2008, 03:24 AM   #60 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Stormy Weeks's Avatar
Status Edited
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Durkdurkistan
Posts: 216

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cindy Claveau View Post
"We want to get out of the business of enforcement" - Philip Linden, 2006 after opening the grid to free accounts.
And yet Katt Linden is talking about potential permanent in-world bannings for breaches of forum etiquette.
Stormy Weeks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 04:44 AM   #61 (permalink)
exp(ln(Gearhead))
 
Aodhan McDunnough's Avatar
ti gnivol dna ykeeG
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 3,615
SL Join Date: March 28, 2006
Business: Aodhan's Forge
SLShopper Ads: 2

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tess Whitcroft View Post
How about if you built in a restriction that you couldn't sell land below a certain price without selling it TO a specific avatar? The sell process just wouldn't activate for a sale below, for example, L$1 per sq meter (those of you who regularly buy and sell land I am sure could suggest a better price than my wild guess) unless a specific sell to avatar name was entered. No one would ever enter the name of any landbot in any transaction like that so that usefulness of predatory landbots would be pretty much zero.

Tess
I like this. Only issue I see is if someone is really intending to open sell at giveaway prices.
Aodhan McDunnough is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 01:56 PM   #62 (permalink)
FUCKCHOP! FUUUUUUCKCHOP!
 
reeneebob Birmingham's Avatar
Goodbye horses.
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada - COMMIE SOCIALIST COUNTRY WHOOOO! WHOOOOOOOO!
Posts: 408
SL Join Date: August 7, 2006
Business: I support others business

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormy Weeks View Post
And yet Katt Linden is talking about potential permanent in-world bannings for breaches of forum etiquette.
That's a tad over the top.
reeneebob Birmingham is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 02:04 PM   #63 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Colette Meiji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,221

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormy Weeks View Post
And yet Katt Linden is talking about potential permanent in-world bannings for breaches of forum etiquette.
Thats been in for years. Since 2005


[/sarcasm on]
Basically it was Robin/Jeska/Pathfinder's brilliant solution to the "Prok Problem"
[/sarcasm off]

It allowed them to ban Prok from the official forums but not in-game and still appear on the surface to be lenient.

Of course that was back in the days when they felt they were also bound by the rules.

There are a lot of people who stopped posting on the official forums because of that issue. Its a pretty big threat to lose your access inworld / your virtual stuff/ your business just because of a Forums argument.

I am not sure how many times it has been enforced since 05 though. Can't be many. No permabans that I can remember anyway.

It is a stupid rule.
Colette Meiji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 02:23 PM   #64 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 379

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aodhan McDunnough View Post
I like this. Only issue I see is if someone is really intending to open sell at giveaway prices.
These people would be few and far between I imagine. Also, they probably would rather see the land goto someone with an ounce of dignity rather than some dumb predatory landbot. They can advertise on forums and no doubt will have a buyer within the hour.
Tranquility is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2008, 02:46 PM   #65 (permalink)
Stabbity!
 
Beezle Warburton's Avatar
GAH!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Darkmere
Posts: 2,490
SL Join Date: October 24, 2006
SLShopper Ads: 13

My Mood:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colette Meiji View Post
It is a stupid rule.
Hence likely to be arbitrarily enforced.

I think I'll just keep my argumentative self out of the main forums.
__________________

Second Life®, SL®, $L™, Lindens™, Linden Dollars®, Linden Lab®, Missing Image™, [RESOLVED]™
and the color gray are trademarks or registered trademarks of Linden Research, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Beezle Warburton is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 08-08-2008, 03:02 PM   #66 (permalink)
Is that the time?
 
Ordinal Malaprop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Caledon
Posts: 230

Forum bans are arbitrarily enforced as it is (not that this is very easy to get right, I am aware - I do moderate forums myself). Tying it to inworld banning is and always has been madness, and I'm sure results in people not being banned from the forums who really should be, as the added punishment is considered too harsh. Particularly for a permanent ban.

But speaking personally I am just not interested in the official forums until they fix the software. It has been over a year now and there is absolutely no excuse for them not to have done it. Every time I think about the matter it feels as if I have been paid a visit by SlapInTheFace Linden.
Ordinal Malaprop is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 08-08-2008, 03:20 PM   #67 (permalink)
Never trust a hippy
 
caroline ra's Avatar
MYOB
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Zummerzet
Posts: 1,295
SL Join Date: Dec 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beezle Warburton View Post
Hence likely to be arbitrarily enforced.

I think I'll just keep my argumentative self out of the main forums.
I had to stop posting there. I tend to write as if I were speaking. Although I dont have a limited vocabulary I still like to sprinkle my speech with various profanities. This forum is more tolerant of the minority of us who, while not exactly suffering from tourettes, do love to fucking swear.

Last edited by caroline ra; 08-08-2008 at 03:26 PM.
caroline ra is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Said Thanks:
Old 08-08-2008, 03:24 PM   #68 (permalink)
Coco's Cottages
 
Cocoanut Koala's Avatar
There is no sanctuary. You may think there is, but there is not.
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,368
Business: Coco's Cottages
SLShopper Ads: 3

Awards: 1
Thread Title of the Week 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colette Meiji View Post
Thats been in for years. Since 2005


[/sarcasm on]
Basically it was Robin/Jeska/Pathfinder's brilliant solution to the "Prok Problem"
[/sarcasm off]

It allowed them to ban Prok from the official forums but not in-game and still appear on the surface to be lenient.

Of course that was back in the days when they felt they were also bound by the rules.

There are a lot of people who stopped posting on the official forums because of that issue. Its a pretty big threat to lose your access inworld / your virtual stuff/ your business just because of a Forums argument.

I am not sure how many times it has been enforced since 05 though. Can't be many. No permabans that I can remember anyway.

It is a stupid rule.
One of the things it does is keep people who have something to lose - in other words, thoughtful and contributing and possibly long-term residents - from feeling they can use the forums without having to walk on eggshells.

Because they HAVE so much to lose.

And as Desmond pointed out, everybody is going to have a bad day and say things they regret, "even if it takes years," he says.

Whereas any jerk with nothing to lose can say whatever he wants, and what does he care?

Result: More people talking who have nothing to lose who don't care; fewer thoughtful people talking who have more experience and investment in SL (including those who have built businesses in-world), and might have a lot of worthwhile things to add.

End Result: A gradual but real dumbing down.

coco
__________________
Newest Addition: Freebie of the Month!

'Lil Cottage Series #8

ARABIAN NIGHTS by Shagz Anubis

Pick yours up at Coco's Cottages!
Rosieri 87,165,88

http://www.sluniverse.com/php/shop/s...p?product=4862
Cocoanut Koala is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 08-08-2008, 03:32 PM   #69 (permalink)
Taco's Grammar Slave
 
Khamon's Avatar
Some Flowers and Trees
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,894
SL Join Date: November, 2003
SLShopper Ads: 2

My Mood:

Another option is to add a "Sell to Public" box that must be intentionally checked in order for the parcel to appear for sale in Find and on the map.

Or add a "Sell to Me Only" box that people would easily see and check if that's what they were meaning to do. It could even be default checked so that a seller would have to uncheck it to make the sale publicly available.
__________________
Please Visit Our Gardens and Our Website
Khamon is online now   Reply With Quote
1 User Agreed:
Old 08-08-2008, 04:17 PM   #70 (permalink)
Konichiwa, Bitches
 
Brenda Connolly's Avatar
I'll Be Back
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nu Jerzee, USSA
Posts: 4,392
SL Join Date: January 2007

Fixed:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ordinal Malaprop View Post
Every time I think about the matter it feels as if I have been paid a visit by SlapNuts Linden.
To be truthful, I don't see it as much more than the usual Linden legacy of unfufilled promises. Update the software. Now, and maybe that will show me they actually do give a shit. Otherwise, I think that place will either just lumber along until it implodes, or LL will act, and turn the place into the sterile, dry techno forum the elitists over there want,

Last edited by Brenda Connolly; 08-08-2008 at 04:23 PM.
Brenda Connolly is offline   Reply With Quote
1 User Laughed:
Old 08-08-2008, 07:19 PM   #71 (permalink)
Uppity Alt
 
Beebo Brink's Avatar
I'm the woman your mother warned you about.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,899
SL Join Date: October 2006
SLShopper Ads: 20

My Mood:

There is at least one valid reason for setting land for sale at below-market rate and that's to unload it quickly before being hit with another tier fee. The tier you pay in waiting days or weeks or longer for a land parcel to sell on the open market may be more than you would lose selling at a bargain price. And sometimes people choose to liquidate quickly and leave SL, or for pressing RL reasons must leave quickly. Dumping to a land bot is one way to recover at least a portion of your land investement instead of abandoning the land to LL at a complete loss.

Given how low the recent land prices have dropped, is it feasible for LL to set some arbitrary limit for a prohibited land price? Guaranteed, if someone tries to list their land at L$1/m for sale to anybody, and the system won't let them do it, they'll just bump it up to L$2 or L$3 without stopping to think why. If they can bypass the "Sell to" option when they know exactly who the buyer is, they'll bypass the price limit too.

I applaud the effort to find solutions to this user error, but this particular solution doesn't thrill me.
__________________
Beebo Brink is online now   Reply With Quote