To add to what Fmeh said...
This is the cost of a free society.
In a free society, you have to make it as hard as possible for the state to remove liberty. In any balance between letting the guilty go or punishing the innocent - you must error on the side of letting the guilty go.
Its rough at times, like this. But without setting it that way, you lose the concept of liberty.
The sad thing is... this woman will probably -not- have a major personal loss for her conduct. She'll probably gain some level of notoriety and even be celebrated in certain circles; if she manages to migrate into them.
side track:
We're dealing with an age where technology is outpacing social and legel development. Human beings cannot keep up with their toys. Each generation ends up with a radically different frame of mind, and by the time they are adults, the toys out there are already ahead of the norms they are locked into... (witness recent news stories about the downfall of civilization due to teen texting...)
And to bring that back on topic...
- What we have here is a case of one generation not understanding another's use of a technology: a parent not understanding their child's use of Web 2.0... while another adult used that same technology to prey upon the child.
On the one hand I want to say, "this is why the internet isn't for kids."
But on the other hand... "the internet is changing too fast for adults to keep up."