Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Nightshade  Oh I don't doubt they existed either, my point is just that I think it's a bit strange to declare the reason of their destruction proven when they haven't even found the cities in the first place; it's the implied validation of the first that seems a little  to me. Because obviously if they've proven what got rid of them that implies they proved they were there to begin with, right? 0_o |
That .. and how do they know the witness was really a eye-witness and not a "Witness" (in the evangelical sense)?
Its just a tablet that is a couple thousand years old.
Theres no proof of anything.