Quote:
Originally Posted by CaleVinson  I think you're reading it correctly Brenda, and I if I recall correctly the "applies to all" was a central plank of the system as discussed in an epic SC thread.
Many people recoil against this aspect (I do too), but at the end of the day, anyone is entitled to ban anyone from their land for whatever reason they see fit. |
Of course they are. But they always were, before this clown showed up. I don't need any "Court" to tell me who to allow on my land. *If I owned any, that is* But he seems to think that he will be able to foist this upon EVERYONE, whether they "subscribe" to his service or not. How does he propose to do that?