Quote:
Originally Posted by Nika Talaj  Do you go to the bug triage meetings inworld? If so, how do you reconcile the way Lindens there speak of prioritizing and assigning bugs in their internal Jira system, with your assertion that no one assigns work at LL? The way they speak about it is in line with every other software group I've ever been part of. I've never heard a Linden say: oh wait, so-and-so refuses to fix bugs. |
What day and time and what loc Nika? I will go each week. I would love to listen, learn, participate and contribute in those meetings. I have a very strong strategic background and I would love to be, minimally, a fly on the wall.
Ready, willing and able. All I need is time and place.
Now if the meeting is CLOSED, and we are dependent on how the Lindens SPEAK of prioritizing and assigning bugs in their internal Jira system ... well, the trust is not there, and was blown to smithereens long ago. What ARE the triage priorities if we must depend on the Lindens to communicate the process? What prohibitions are in place to hold work on any bell or whistle that may add to the already bad asset server problems? Where on the triage list is "making the current customer experience more smooth and transparent in ways large and small"? Versus, we need a little more purple on the sunset and we really need true reflective surfaces (mirror windows) so we can reflect objects in them too?
Once again, time and place please. I'll be there.
If the meetings are closed, I think you may owe Coco a bit of an apology. As I said earlier, and as others here have said, in the absence of concrete supporting evidence, believe NOTHING that a Linden says. Trust once lost is generally gone for good. Linden trust is SO gone.
