Quote:
Originally Posted by Richie Waves  |
This is an interesting read, though I must admit that I am not knowledgeable enough in banking and finance to judge the veracity of the claims made. However, one thing seems particularly odd to me about this. If all of these things are true, why does this story need an Elliot Spitzer? If the Bush administration is so complicit, and it's all so brazen and obvious, then won't there be a cavalcade of politicians and journalists writing about this? I just don't see how "taking out" Spitzer would solve anything for the administration.
The sad truth is, if this administration is going to target everybody that is critical of them they are going to have to go after more than half of the country.
And that my friend is gonna take a whole lot of hookers.