Quote:
Originally Posted by livia  There's a difference between listening and altering an opinion based on what was heard. It's not a lack of listening just because someone does not change their opinions to suit you.[...] |
it is when they (like you) have no contextual understanding of the topic, and ignore it when it's presented.
Quote:
|
What a bunch of say nothing. The discussion has not increased my awareness of the broader issue. You claimed the stunt was useful because it brought exposure to the issue itself. Your evidence of this useful exposure is that some non-US voter has gained no awareness of the wider issue, but does now know about the stunt that was supposed to bring exposure and hence awareness about the wider issue. Sure that makes sense Void, in dellusionvile. I prefer not to dwell there.
|
may I remind you of your own words....
Quote:
|
This is not "how to make a point"
|
Quote:
|
People seem to think that this will help by showing how absurd the whole project of such state regulation is, but...
|
Quote:
|
How are they to feel effected if it's a stunt, political theatre, and has no chance of passing or will be easily repealed if it does pass?
|
Quote:
| I only heard about this stuff because I visited this forum. |
Quote:
|
You claimed the stunt was useful because it brought exposure to the issue itself.
|
and because I've despise repeating myself when there is such a clear inability to recognize your own words, let alone all other facts that have been demonstrated to you (except one), I'm invoking three strikes law: ie, you're out.
I'll leave you with this final thought to consider alone by yourself:
One should never become so attached to an initial position that one fails to consider any evidence along the way. One's own opinion is never evidence of anything, only the facts that support it are.